Re the "[protobuf-net]" - it seems to be a glitch in google groups. It
is there (see "More options" for the top message) - it just doesn't
appear!
Feel free to send me a patch (marc.grav...@gmail.com). Note that I've
got a big branch in progress, so I'd probably need to re-implement it
for the re
(Hmmm, today I can't see the [protobuf-net] that I added to the
subject.)
I knew about that option, actually, my app is using that approach. I'm
using protobuf-net with WCF, keeping existent [DataContract]/
[DataMember] attributes, and have a base class AbstractMessage with
some common informatio
> Note the subject line -- it's protobuf-net. :)
I see "Class hierarchy serialization" using google-groups.
(ahhh - if you expand "More options" you see the full "[protobuf-net]
Class hierarchy serialization" - interesting!)
OK - to expand:
protobuf-net supports class hierarchies, which is doe
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Marc Gravell wrote:
>
> What implementation are you using? Given that most of the
> implementations use code-generation (rather than reflection), I'm
> wondering if this is protobuf-net?
> (since that supports inheritance by representing it as nested
> messages).
What implementation are you using? Given that most of the
implementations use code-generation (rather than reflection), I'm
wondering if this is protobuf-net?
(since that supports inheritance by representing it as nested
messages).
Marc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
