+1 for SPEED.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Mar 5, 11:39 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
As you know if you've read the docs carefully, when using C++ or Java
protocol buffers, for best performance you need to add a line to your .proto
files:
option optimize_for = SPEED;
snip commentary
I think there are three issues
+1 for making it a compiler command-line option.
Pretty much all other IDLs get this wrong to some degree also.
Having annotations or options in the IDL file is nice, but make sure
they are only helping to define the message and the service, not the
implementation.
When I get a service
+1 for making it a compiler command-line option.
Pretty much all other IDLs get this wrong to some degree also.
Having annotations or options in the IDL file is nice, but make sure
they are only helping to define the message and the service, not the
implementation.
When I get a service
On Mar 6, 2:23 pm, aepensky apen...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for making it a compiler command-line option.
Pretty much all other IDLs get this wrong to some degree also.
Having annotations or options in the IDL file is nice, but make sure
they are only helping to define the message and the
Sorry, I realize that wasn't a very clear statement...
What I mean is, if there is an option which does not leave any
fingerprint in either the serialized message or the
FileDescriptorSet, so that you can't tell how the option was set by
looking at either of these, then the option is controlling
On Mar 6, 4:55 pm, aepensky apen...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I realize that wasn't a very clear statement...
What I mean is, if there is an option which does not leave any
fingerprint in either the serialized message or the
FileDescriptorSet, so that you can't tell how the option was set by
I agree that there should be a way to specify options on the command-line.
This applies to pretty much *all* options -- optimize_for, java_Package,
ctype, etc. It would even be useful to be able to munge package and class
names on the command-line, so that you can generate the same .proto file
+1 for SPEED.
-dave
On Mar 5, 3:39 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Hi all,
As you know if you've read the docs carefully, when using C++ or Java
protocol buffers, for best performance you need to add a line to your .proto
files:
option optimize_for = SPEED;
Otherwise, by
