So is there a decision for this issue? Will it be a flag for protoc or
a patch (I think I saw somewhere a post mentioning that the patch was
not going to be used because of other issues)? And any possible ETA
for the solution?
On Aug 31, 5:33 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
I'm OK
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:25, mo mohammad.kolahdou...@gmail.com wrote:
So is there a decision for this issue? Will it be a flag for protoc or
a patch (I think I saw somewhere a post mentioning that the patch was
not going to be used because of other issues)? And any possible ETA
for the
What compiler flags are you using? Since you were able to compile
libprotobuf itself, I assume you have turned on additional warnings for your
own project?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Joshua Haberman jhaber...@gmail.comwrote:
I just installed Snow Leopard, which ships with:
$ gcc
Good point, this was with -Wextra (which I had forgotten I compile
with). I can understand if you're not interested in accommodating
this. It is strange that -Wextra warns about this for this particular
gcc version, but not others that I've tried.
On Aug 31, 4:49 pm, Kenton Varda
On Aug 31, 5:17 pm, Michael Poole mdpo...@troilus.org wrote:
Joshua Haberman writes:
The protobuf library compiled and installed fine, but the generated
classes threw warnings (and since I was compiling with -Werror, failed
to compile). The warning was:
