Re: Visual Studio 200x fix

2009-03-31 Thread Kenton Varda
I intend to apply this soon, when I put together the next release. In the meantime, have you signed the CLA? http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Oleg Smolsky wrote: > Fair enough. I've attach

Re: Visual Studio 200x fix

2009-03-26 Thread Oleg Smolsky
Fair enough. I've attached a patch that adds a new command line option. Oleg. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Kenton Varda wrote: > The existing format mimics GCC.  Unfortunately I think if we changed it, it > would break other tools.  Maybe we could enable this format based on a > command-line

Re: Visual Studio 200x fix

2009-03-26 Thread Kenton Varda
The existing format mimics GCC. Unfortunately I think if we changed it, it would break other tools. Maybe we could enable this format based on a command-line flag? On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:59 PM, os_ wrote: > > Hey there, below is a tiny patch that lets VS200x go to the correct > line in the

Visual Studio 200x fix

2009-03-25 Thread os_
Hey there, below is a tiny patch that lets VS200x go to the correct line in the .proto file when generation fails. IE it's to allow the interactive F4/NextError where VS relies on a certain format of error messages. Regards, Oleg. diff -aur ../protobuf-2.0.3-orig/src/google/protobuf/compiler/ co