[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey updated PROTON-214:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.4
Test proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13584122#comment-13584122
]
Philip Harvey commented on PROTON-214:
--
This test was also failing when run under the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey reassigned PROTON-214:
Assignee: Philip Harvey (was: Gordon Sim)
Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey updated PROTON-214:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.5)
Test proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus
OK.
I've modified JNIMessenger to throw ProtonUnsupportedOperationException so
testSendBogus skips rather than fails when using the proton-jni profile. I
believe there is still an issue with the pure Java implementation too
because this test fails on my dev machine (though not on the Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey updated PROTON-214:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.4
Test proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey updated PROTON-214:
-
Description:
The system test proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus is failing
I wonder if anybody out there in Proton Land has an
opinion about this little piece of Proton doc.
This is an example of the documentation I'm creating as
I use the Proton interface to
I'd be interested to hear about
1. correctness
2. clarity
3. focus
4.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0800, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble
issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote.
Source is here:
- http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/
Java
[X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final
FYI: tested Centos-5 x86_64, proton-c build, proton-c unit tests, and install
tested F17 x86_64, proton-c/proton-j/proton-jni unit tests pass (aside
from PROTON-214)
-K
- Original Message -
Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with
All topology tests pass.
Nihil obstat. Imprimatur.
+1
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:54:27 PM
Subject: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately
Hi Darryl,
Proton represents the UUID as binary, hence the 16 byte array. For string
representations, such as Ruby's, that would have to be converted to ascii/utf8
hex, and would require the 32 bytes for proper representation.
In python, we have to manually convert the uuid in pn_data_t
Also, the AMQP specification defines uuid as 16-bytes.
-Ted
On 02/22/2013 11:29 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Hi Darryl,
Proton represents the UUID as binary, hence the 16 byte array. For string
representations, such as Ruby's, that would have to be converted to ascii/utf8
hex, and would require
Hi Michael,
Looks like a good start.
Where are you intending to store this documentation? Similarly, where are
you intending to publish it, e.g. as HTML and/or PDF on our web site, as a
wiki page etc?
I'm particularly interested in this topic because I'm focusing on the lower
level Engine
[X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final
[ ] No, because ...
15 matches
Mail list logo