Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-25 Thread Rajith Attapattu
For starters I would copy this email to the user list. (In the future we should post things like this to a more wider audience, especially if we are looking for feedback based on real world use cases.) I actually like the minimalistic approach you've taken here. It works well in an embedded

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.comwrote: For starters I would copy this email to the user list. (In the future we should post things like this to a more wider audience, especially if we are looking for feedback based on real world use cases.) I posted it

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-25 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.comwrote: For starters I would copy this email to the user list. (In the future we should post things like this to a more wider audience, especially if

Re: Getting AMQP message properties though Proton-C

2013-03-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
You're quite welcome. You're correct about the type in the dump. It is a value of the pn_type_t enum. I just changed the code to use the type name instead of the numeric value, so that should be more obvious in the next release. --Rafael On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Arun Dsouza