I am trying to understand the fundamental differences
between AMQP 1.0 / Proton messaging, and what we've
done before -- and to express it in language that
non-engineers can clearly understand and get excited
about. Messaging for poets.
You who already Get It -- please read this and tell
me
On 03/27/2013 07:28 AM, Michael Goulish wrote:
I am trying to understand the fundamental differences
between AMQP 1.0 / Proton messaging, and what we've
done before -- and to express it in language that
non-engineers can clearly understand and get excited
about. Messaging for poets.
You who
On 03/25/2013 09:30 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
I question the value of having this as part of the API. It seems to me
that the Messenger routing table should be part of the configuration of a
system (i.e. in a place like
Hi all
Phil and I are tasked with producing a comprehensive set of system
tests for Proton Engine.
The aim is to produce a test suite that will execute against all
Proton implementations thus guaranteeing that all exhibit identical
behaviour and assuring conformance with the AMQP 1-0
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W keith.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Phil and I are tasked with producing a comprehensive set of system
tests for Proton Engine.
The aim is to produce a test suite that will execute against all
Proton implementations thus guaranteeing that all
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
1. Will the bottom half continue to accept more input?
In a way this is kind of unimportant to specify. With the way the new
transport interface works, the driver will read anywhere from 0 up to
capacity bytes into
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.comwrote:
On 27 March 2013 21:16, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W keith.w...@gmail.com wrote:
[..snip..]
3. How will the application using top half API know an error
