Re: RC7

2012-10-27 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Opps I meant f17 :) Rajith On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > On friday I ran the java and C builds on f14 (64bit) and passed > without any issues. > > Rajith > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: >> +1 RC7 proton-c {mai

Re: RC7

2012-10-27 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On friday I ran the java and C builds on f14 (64bit) and passed without any issues. Rajith On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: > +1 RC7 proton-c {mainly Debian6 i686 testing} > > -K > > - Original Message - >> Lucky number 7 posted here: >> &g

Re: RC7

2012-10-26 Thread Ken Giusti
+1 RC7 proton-c {mainly Debian6 i686 testing} -K - Original Message - > Lucky number 7 posted here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc7/ > > Only changes from RC6 are added LICENSE headers and two minor fixes > to the > Java SASL imple

Re: RC7

2012-10-26 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:13:55AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Lucky number 7 posted here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc7/ > > Only changes from RC6 are added LICENSE headers and two minor fixes to the > Java SASL implementation (PROTON-103). Local package build work

RC7

2012-10-26 Thread Rafael Schloming
Lucky number 7 posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc7/ Only changes from RC6 are added LICENSE headers and two minor fixes to the Java SASL implementation (PROTON-103). --Rafael