Not to hijack this thread, but...
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:00:23 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Bozo Dragojevic bo
on their restrictiveness - matching more
restrictive first?
-K
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 12:43:07 PM
Subject: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger
Hi,
I've added a new API
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Not to hijack this thread, but...
Yes, absolutely - this is a Must Have as far as I'm concerned.
Specifically:
1) The application should control whether Reply-to is set or not
(currently always set by messenger)
2) The
: new routing functionality for messenger
Hi,
I've added a new API to messenger that gives the user some control
over the
internal routing behaviour of a messenger. Please check it out and
comment.
I've pasted the C API/doxygen below. This is currently only exposed
through
the python binding via
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:11:51PM -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
I am starting to think we need a proton routing plug-in API so that
different choices of routing rules, pattern matching, configuration
files etc. can be implemented without baking one set of choices into
messenger. Such a plugin API
On 03/25/2013 09:30 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
I question the value of having this as part of the API. It seems to me
that the Messenger routing table should be part of the configuration of a
system (i.e. in a place like
On 3/25/13 8:26 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Bozo Dragojevicbo...@digiverse.si wrote:
Rafael,
did you consider a variant where a user can supply a rewrite object?
pn_messenger_set_router(pn_**messenger_t *msgr, pn_router_t *router)
Proton library can then
On 3/23/13 5:43 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi,
I've added a new API to messenger that gives the user some control over the
internal routing behaviour of a messenger. Please check it out and comment.
I've pasted the C API/doxygen below. This is currently only exposed through
the python binding
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Bozo Dragojevic bo...@digiverse.si wrote:
On 3/23/13 5:43 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi,
I've added a new API to messenger that gives the user some control over
the
internal routing behaviour of a messenger. Please check it out and
comment.
I've pasted
On 03/25/2013 09:30 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
I generally like this translation facility, though I'll need to think
through some use cases to make sure there's sufficient capability in the
matching and substitution.
I would
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/25/2013 09:30 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
I generally like this translation facility, though I'll need to think
through some use cases to make sure
For starters I would copy this email to the user list.
(In the future we should post things like this to a more wider
audience, especially if we are looking for feedback based on real
world use cases.)
I actually like the minimalistic approach you've taken here. It works
well in an embedded
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.comwrote:
For starters I would copy this email to the user list.
(In the future we should post things like this to a more wider
audience, especially if we are looking for feedback based on real
world use cases.)
I posted it
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.comwrote:
For starters I would copy this email to the user list.
(In the future we should post things like this to a more wider
audience, especially if
14 matches
Mail list logo
