I assume that such tests would be done peer-to-peer for right now. That would
also give us a baseline for brokerless so that we can also compare various
brokers from such a baseline.
In such a test we should be able to configure, as we do today with qpid perf
test, the number of subscribers
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
I like what I'm hearing - here are some objectives based on what has been
proposed so far:
1) Messenger-based scale and soak tests.
These would be 'black-box' type tests that would mimic simple
deployment scenarios,
Personally I feel like #3 is really a bit of a different animal from
the
others. It's a functional test rather than a performance test, and
I'm not
sure how possible/desirable it is to cover both with the same test
code.
Agreed - it isn't a perf/soak test. But it is on my mental glaring
I've got a amqp benchmarking project started at:
https://github.com/chirino/amqp-benchmark
It measures sender/consumer throughput under a bunch of different usage
scenarios. Let me know what your think. We could bring it into the qpid
project if it would make it easier to collaborate on it
