On 04/18/2013 06:21 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I spoke a bit too soon in my first reply. The tracking windows are
*supposed* to be measured from the point where the tracker is first
assigned, so from when you call put or get. This means that it shouldn't
matter how many times you call recv or
Oh! Oh! Let me try! (see inline)
- Original Message -
On 04/18/2013 06:21 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I spoke a bit too soon in my first reply. The tracking windows are
*supposed* to be measured from the point where the tracker is first
assigned, so from when you call put or
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Michael Goulish mgoul...@redhat.comwrote:
Oh! Oh! Let me try! (see inline)
- Original Message -
On 04/18/2013 06:21 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I spoke a bit too soon in my first reply. The tracking windows are
*supposed* to be measured
I spoke a bit too soon in my first reply. The tracking windows are
*supposed* to be measured from the point where the tracker is first
assigned, so from when you call put or get. This means that it shouldn't
matter how many times you call recv or how much credit recv gives out, the
only thing that
( a question inspired by a question from a reviewer of
one of my docs... )
If you set an incoming message window of a certain size,
and if Messenger can receive messages even when you, i.e.
call send() - - - what's to stop some messages from
falling off the edge of that window, and thus
