On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Ted Ross wrote:
I'm not crazy about the work-processing function names as they seem to
disregard the grammar. Should they not all be pn_connection_* functions?
I agree about this. I would
- Original Message -
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Ted Ross wrote:
I'm not crazy about the work-processing function names as they
seem to
disregard the grammar. Should they not all be pn_connection_*
I would strongly favour shared documentation as much as possible.
The concepts , examples etc.. can be handled via a common document and
we might have to have some language specific sections.
Rajith
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I've
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:46:00PM -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.comwrote:
methods on Messenger and Message objects and by tying pn_messenger_free and
Ted Ross created PROTON-25:
--
Summary: Connection doesn't transistion to PN_REMOTE_CLOSED when
socket is closed.
Key: PROTON-25
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-25
Project: Qpid Proton
