[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated PROTON-157:
--
Attachment: PROTON-157-improved+test.patch
More efficient fix + test to show issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated PROTON-157:
--
Attachment: PROTON-157-improved+test-2.patch
Improved test case that hits the exact symptom reported
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated PROTON-157:
--
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: 0.3
Assignee: Gordon Sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated PROTON-157:
--
Attachment: (was: PROTON-157-improved+test.patch)
invalid delivery-id sent or out of order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey updated PROTON-172:
-
Attachment: 0001-PROTON-172-refactored-Java-SSL-implementation-to-mak.patch
refactored Java SSL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated PROTON-157:
--
Attachment: PROTON-157-improved+test-3.patch
Cleaned up test changes: no need to disable asserts,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated PROTON-157:
--
Attachment: (was: PROTON-157-improved+test-2.patch)
invalid delivery-id sent or out of order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved PROTON-157.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by r1416944.
invalid delivery-id sent or out of order
Thanks!
protonWinSnap works fine for me, at least from what I have seen so far.
If I understood correctly, protonWinSnap will be kept up to date until the
merge to the main codebase is done, and that protonWin is meant only for
patch reviews?
Regards, Ljupco
On 30 November 2012 14:27, Mary
I'm glad protonWinSnap worked for you.
You're right about protonWin. It is just for patch reviews and will not
compile in Windows without all the patches added to the code.
I won't be able to keep protonWinSnap as up to date as I would like, but if
it gets too far out of date, let me know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509870#comment-13509870
]
Philip Harvey commented on PROTON-136:
--
Hi Ken,
I'm keen to explore what
Thanks for the reply Ted.
In an attempt to avoid the uuid module problem I've managed to upgrade to a
later version of Python (2.6), and am now hitting a different error -- now
at build time.
When I run make all I get the following error:
$ cd build
$ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr ..
$ make
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 17:46 +, Phil Harvey wrote:
...
Linking C shared module _cproton.so
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/config/libpython2.6.a(abstract.o):
relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making
a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:16 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I've pushed the Perl language bindings as well as the send/recv examples
for using the qpid::proton::Messenger and qpid::proton::Message classes.
These changes break make install for a developer build installing in a
non system
14 matches
Mail list logo
