On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 21:16, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W wrote:
> >
>
> [..snip..]
>
> >
> >> 3. How will the application using top half API know an error has
> >> occured? What are the application's respo
On 27 March 2013 21:16, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W wrote:
>
[..snip..]
>
>> 3. How will the application using top half API know an error has
>> occured? What are the application's responsibilities when it learns of
>> an error?
>>
>
> The transport has a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> 1. Will the bottom half continue to accept more input?
>>
>
> In a way this is kind of unimportant to specify. With the way the new
> transport interface works, the driver will read anywhere from 0 up to
> "capacity" bytes into the transp
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Phil and I are tasked with producing a comprehensive set of system
> tests for Proton Engine.
>
> The aim is to produce a test suite that will execute against all
> Proton implementations thus guaranteeing that all exhibit identical
>
On 03/27/2013 11:53 AM, Keith W wrote:
Hi all
Phil and I are tasked with producing a comprehensive set of system
tests for Proton Engine.
The aim is to produce a test suite that will execute against all
Proton implementations thus guaranteeing that all exhibit identical
behaviour and assuring
While sending messages through a Proton-C client, is it possible to set the
settled flag on the AMQP Transfer frame to false?
I wish to receive an ACK / NACK from the broker to which I am sending messages,
which will let my application know whether the send was successful or not.
Thanks,
Arun
Hi all
Phil and I are tasked with producing a comprehensive set of system
tests for Proton Engine.
The aim is to produce a test suite that will execute against all
Proton implementations thus guaranteeing that all exhibit identical
behaviour and assuring conformance with the AMQP 1-0 specificatio
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
>
> On 03/25/2013 09:30 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
>>
>> I question the value of having this as part of the API. It seems to me
>>> that the Messenger routing table should be part of the con
On 03/25/2013 09:30 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
I question the value of having this as part of the API. It seems to me
that the Messenger routing table should be part of the configuration of a
system (i.e. in a place like /etc/qpid/messenger/,
On 03/27/2013 07:28 AM, Michael Goulish wrote:
I am trying to understand the fundamental differences
between AMQP 1.0 / Proton messaging, and what we've
done before -- and to express it in language that
non-engineers can clearly understand and get excited
about. Messaging for poets.
You who a
I am trying to understand the fundamental differences
between AMQP 1.0 / Proton messaging, and what we've
done before -- and to express it in language that
non-engineers can clearly understand and get excited
about. Messaging for poets.
You who already Get It -- please read this and tell
me whe
11 matches
Mail list logo
