Bozo -- i see you're right. The size of my delivery list -- i.e. the list at
connection->work_head -- is slowly increasing, and that's the problem. There
is
something I'm not handling, which gets a lot worse under heavy system load, and
my
sender never digs itself out.
But -- what I want he
On 28. 10. 14 20:18, Michael Goulish wrote:
> I have gotten callgrind call-graph pictures of my proton/engine sender
> and receiver when the test is running fast and when it slows down.
>
> The difference is in the sender -- when running fast, it is spending
> most of its time in the subtree of p
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to try to get the proton releases to be a bit more frequent, and
I'm also trying to get a bit more up front planning into them. To that end
I've put together a quick description of what I'd propose for timeline and
scope of the next release here:
http://qpid.apache.org/pro
I have gotten callgrind call-graph pictures of my proton/engine sender
and receiver when the test is running fast and when it slows down.
The difference is in the sender -- when running fast, it is spending
most of its time in the subtree of pn_connector_process() .. like 71%.
When it slows do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Ross updated PROTON-334:
---
Assignee: Andrew Stitcher
> SASL Plug-in for Proton
> ---
>
> Key:
[X] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
Proton-J side still works for AMQ.
On 10/27/2014 09:51 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today, so
I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.
I've posted RC5 i
[X] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
Testing: Proton-c build, unit tests, and install on Fedora20 and Centos7 x86_64
- Original Message -
> From: "Rafael Schloming"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:51:00 PM
> Subject: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 a
[ X ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final.
I ran the C and Java build+tests, and tried out the published Java binaries
using the JMS client build+tests.
Aside: doing a binary diff of the archive contents shows a second small
change since RC4, in the python bindings: http://svn.apache.org/r16