[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13720696#comment-13720696
 ] 

Philip Harvey commented on PROTON-366:
--------------------------------------

I don't think this patch should be committed without wider review.  From a 
quick check, I notice:

- Curly braces should be on new lines as per 
[https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Java+Coding+Standards]
- I doubt we really want to add a compile-time dependency on hawtbuf and 
hawtdispatch-transport to proton-j (or have I misread the patch?)
-  We've been very careful about additions to proton's public interface so far, 
so the addition of a command-line utility in proton-j-impl is something that 
merits discussion on the proton mailing list. 
- Instead of cluttering the pom with locations of sample data files used to 
test the utility, should this should all be inside a JUnit test?
                
> Add a protocol dump utility for java
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PROTON-366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-366
>             Project: Qpid Proton
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: proton-j
>    Affects Versions: 0.4
>            Reporter: Justin Ross
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: QPID-4106.patch
>
>
> This bug was originally under the QPID jira instance.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to