frames against the
max-frame-size, this causes a framing error which drops the connection.
It's interesting to note that this mis-parse is not a regression. It's
been happening all along but was not noticed because AMQP is much
larger than the typical number of available bytes. Before RC2
I am cancelling the vote on the seconr RC for Proton 0.10, and will
shortly be preparing a third RC.
The changes in RC2 uncovered a issue, that while present previously
was not causing an observable problem before hand but now does
following the additional validation included in RC2
/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc2/
Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1041
Regards,
Robbie
Hi Everyone,
I've put up 0.8 RC2 at the usual places. The source code can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc2/
Java binaries here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1016
Notable changes since RC1 are:
- fix to cmake
+1 (mine it's a non binding vote.. but I wanted to register it since we have
been testing it for a while)
On Oct 14, 2014, at 4:44 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've put up 0.8 RC2 at the usual places. The source code can be found here:
http
, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've put up 0.8 RC2 at the usual places. The source code can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc2/
Java binaries here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1016
Notable
On 8. 04. 14 21:34, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've posted 0.7 RC2 in the usual places. Source can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.7rc2/
Java binaries here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1002/
Note
RC2 in the usual places. Source can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.7rc2/
Java binaries here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1002/
Note that the install procedure has changed from prior versions and the
README has had some
Hi Everyone,
I've posted 0.7 RC2 in the usual places. Source can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.7rc2/
Java binaries here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1002/
Note that the install procedure has changed from prior versions
I messed up in not correctly coordinating my recent cmake changes across
proton and qpid, and now the beta Qpid 0.28 will not build against a
release or candidate Proton.
How possible would it be to put out RC2 very soon so that there would at
least be a release candidate of Proton to build Qpid
-settle-mode=0,
source=@source(40) [address=amqp:/_topo/0/
Router.A/temp.4TQT_a,
durable=0, timeout=0, dynamic=true], initial-delivery-count=0]
On 12/18/2013 04:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've just posted proton 0.6 RC2. The changes since RC1 are listed
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Frank Quinn fqu...@nyx.com wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Could we get PROTON-420 in there too? I attached a patch to the ticket
which fixes, it's just for compiler warning prevention when compiling
against proton with strict flags.
I have applied a modified version of
...@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proton 0.6 RC2
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Frank Quinn fqu...@nyx.com wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Could we get PROTON-420 in there too? I attached a patch to the ticket
which fixes, it's just for compiler warning prevention when compiling
against proton with strict flags.
I have
Hi Everyone,
I've just posted proton 0.6 RC2. The changes since RC1 are listed in the
attached file. Please check it out and let me know if you run into any
issues.
Sources are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc2/
Java binaries are available here:
https
/2013 04:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've just posted proton 0.6 RC2. The changes since RC1 are listed in
the attached file. Please check it out and let me know if you run
into any issues.
Sources are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc2/
http
], initial-delivery-count=0]
On 12/18/2013 04:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've just posted proton 0.6 RC2. The changes since RC1 are listed in the
attached file. Please check it out and let me know if you run into any
issues.
Sources are available here:
http
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:04:33PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
There's been a bunch of fixes now from RC1 testing, so I figured it's about
time to put out an RC2. You can find it here, please check it out:
Build a package for Fedora, installed and tested it and all looks good.
--
Darryl L
On 14.08.2013 22:04, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi,
There's been a bunch of fixes now from RC1 testing, so I figured it's
about time to put out an RC2. You can find it here, please check it out:
Source tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc2/
http://people.apache.org
On 15 August 2013 09:46, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 14.08.2013 22:04, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi,
There's been a bunch of fixes now from RC1 testing, so I figured it's
about time to put out an RC2. You can find it here, please check it out:
Source tarball:
http
On 15.08.2013 12:24, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 15 August 2013 09:46, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 14.08.2013 22:04, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi,
There's been a bunch of fixes now from RC1 testing, so I figured it's
about time to put out an RC2. You can find it here, please check
Hi,
There's been a bunch of fixes now from RC1 testing, so I figured it's about
time to put out an RC2. You can find it here, please check it out:
Source tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc2/
Java binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
Hi Paul
I've successfuly reproduced your issue and are tracking our progress
under PROTON-249. We don't need your debug output at this stage.
Kind regards, Keith.
On 24 February 2013 00:27, Paul O'Fallon p...@ofallonfamily.com wrote:
I filed this as
wrote:
Sure -- here you go! This is what I get when building 0.4 RC2 on
Windows 8
64-bit with Visual Studio 2012:
https://gist.github.com/pofallon/fd31e05971442bc5
(This has both the CMAKE output as well as the Visual Studio build
output)
Thanks,
Paul
On Thu, Feb 21
I'm getting much closer I
still get one error
4 javac: file not found:
C:\qpid-proton-0.4\proton-j\proton-api\src\main\java\org\apache\qpi\proton\driver\Connector.java
4 Usage: javac options source files
4 use -help for a list of possible options
Paul,
That sounds odd. The proton-api
OK.
I've modified JNIMessenger to throw ProtonUnsupportedOperationException so
testSendBogus skips rather than fails when using the proton-jni profile. I
believe there is still an issue with the pure Java implementation too
because this test fails on my dev machine (though not on the Apache
make still fails on Centos-5 due to swig parse error. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-245
I've tried Rafi's suggestion - we could simply ifdef-out the definition when
the header is processed by swig:
#ifndef SWIG // older versions of SWIG choke on this:
static inline
+1 - I'll push the fix.
-K
- Original Message -
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com
wrote:
make still fails on Centos-5 due to swig parse error. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-245
I've tried Rafi's suggestion - we could simply
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 12:31 -0800, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Source posted here:
- http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc2/
Java binaries here:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-280/
I'd like to call an official vote soon, e.g. tomorrow, so
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 11:01 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 12:31 -0800, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Source posted here:
- http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc2/
Java binaries here:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-280/
Hello. Should the RC2 build work on Windows w/o any changes? I tried it
on Win8 / VS 2011 and got a warning from cmake and VS errors in the build
process. I wasn't going to bother reporting them until I saw the below
note about win7 and vs2008. If it *should* work on Windows, I'll follow-up
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote:
Mostly looks good. One test is failing when run using the Java JNI binding
- see below.
Tested:
- Download tarball
- cmake, make, make install
- Observed .so and .jar files installed to correct locations
-
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote:
Mostly looks good. One test is failing when run using the Java JNI
binding
- see below.
Tested:
- Download tarball
- cmake, make,
Sure -- here you go! This is what I get when building 0.4 RC2 on Windows 8
64-bit with Visual Studio 2012:
https://gist.github.com/pofallon/fd31e05971442bc5
(This has both the CMAKE output as well as the Visual Studio build output)
Thanks,
Paul
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Rafael
for the feedback.
Cliff
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Paul O'Fallon p...@ofallonfamily.com wrote:
Sure -- here you go! This is what I get when building 0.4 RC2 on Windows 8
64-bit with Visual Studio 2012:
https://gist.github.com/pofallon/fd31e05971442bc5
(This has both the CMAKE output
Source posted here:
- http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc2/
Java binaries here:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-280/
I'd like to call an official vote soon, e.g. tomorrow, so please have a
look and share your results here.
Changes from RC1:
Mostly looks good. One test is failing when run using the Java JNI binding
- see below.
Tested:
- Download tarball
- cmake, make, make install
- Observed .so and .jar files installed to correct locations
- Ran ./tests/python/proton-test
- Ran mvn package test and observed all tests passing
-
Hi, I've posted a 0.3 RC2.
Sources are here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc2/
Java binaries are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-102/
The following fixes have been made since RC1:
- bumped proton version numbers to 0.3
- python binding
There's a blocker bug in proton-c RC2. I'm investigating...
It appears that messenger truncates the address in the to field on
sent messages so that it only contains the scheme://host portion.
-Ted
On 10/24/2012 08:19 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I've uploaded another release candidate
I'm looking into why this isn't being auto detected properly. You can
always override LIB_SUFFIX manually, i.e. add -DLIB_SUFFIX= to the
command line. (I thought rpm was supposed to do this for you, but maybe
not.)
--Rafael
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
cmake version 2.6-patch 4
-K
- Original Message -
I think this may be related to the cmake version. Can you guys run
cmake
-version and tell me what it reports?
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Rob Godfrey
rob.j.godf...@gmail.comwrote:
I get the same error on CentOS 6.3:
As an aside, I have built successfully on Ubuntu 10.10 and 12.04.
-- Rob
On 24 October 2012 16:49, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
[rob@seelachs ~]$ cmake -version
cmake version 2.6-patch 4
On 24 October 2012 16:39, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
cmake version 2.6-patch
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:32 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I think this may be related to the cmake version. Can you guys run cmake
-version and tell me what it reports?
I think it's more likely missing quotes around a variable expansion that
in this case expands to nothing.
Andrew
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 11:27 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
According to the cmake docs for 2.6.x, the install (DIRECTORY ...) command
doesn't have the OPTIONAL argument. Any ideas on how to work around this?
Why not force the doc build? That's what I did with the qpid cmake build
- it's
I'm a little stumped by this one. I'm thinking the compiler settings must
be quite different from how we normally build, but I'm not sure why.
--Rafael
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:36:11AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 13:44 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.comwrote:
...
How do you force the doc build?
As below.
I couldn't figure out how to add
dependencies between built-in and custom targets.
There is no way to do
45 matches
Mail list logo
