[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13552625#comment-13552625
]
Philip Harvey commented on PROTON-191:
--
After doing an initial sweep, and discussing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13552682#comment-13552682
]
Ken Giusti commented on PROTON-197:
---
Looks good - ship it!
Add small
Hi guys,
I've been using Qpid for the past several months and I really like it. However,
I've mainly just been using it to pass messages between several Python
processes running on the same machine, so using Qpid is probably overkill. Then
I noticed Proton and got excited. Ideally I'm
+1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one.
I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly.
--Rafael
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
+1
Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing. It looks good.
-Ted
On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Rafi,
We should create tags for the releases.
Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for
0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though).
There are branches for the releases, if not tags.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
+1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one.
I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly.
Sorry, thought I'd posted before my +1.
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year
