On 28 March 2013 02:45, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 March 2013 21:16, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W keith.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not to hijack this thread, but...
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:00:23 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Bozo Dragojevic
At first I was a bit skeptical whether this really belongs in the messenger
API, but I've come to accept that it would have to be. Internally, messenger
does perform routing - mapping the 'to' address to the proper connection and
link. To me, this new API provides a level of control over that
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Not to hijack this thread, but...
Yes, absolutely - this is a Must Have as far as I'm concerned.
Specifically:
1) The application should control whether Reply-to is set or not
(currently always set by messenger)
2) The
Ken Giusti created PROTON-278:
-
Summary: Messenger - allow the application to control the use of
the message reply-to field.
Key: PROTON-278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-278
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13616324#comment-13616324
]
Ted Ross commented on PROTON-278:
-
An alternative API is to add a method on the
On 28 March 2013 13:17, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 March 2013 02:45, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote:
On 28 March 2013 13:17, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 March 2013 02:45, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti resolved PROTON-223.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5
Rafael H. Schloming created PROTON-279:
--
Summary: cmake tests don't actually fail even when python tests
are failing
Key: PROTON-279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-279
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti resolved PROTON-279.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5
On 03/28/2013 09:11 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
At first I was a bit skeptical whether this really belongs in the messenger
API, but I've come to accept that it would have to be. Internally, messenger
does perform routing - mapping the 'to' address to the proper connection and
link. To me, this
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:11:51PM -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
I am starting to think we need a proton routing plug-in API so that
different choices of routing rules, pattern matching, configuration
files etc. can be implemented without baking one set of choices into
messenger. Such a plugin API
13 matches
Mail list logo