Re: Defining the behaviour of Proton Engine API under error conditions

2013-03-28 Thread Rob Godfrey
On 28 March 2013 02:45, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 March 2013 21:16, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Keith W keith.w...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-28 Thread Ken Giusti
Not to hijack this thread, but... - Original Message - From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu To: proton@qpid.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:00:23 AM Subject: Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Bozo Dragojevic

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-28 Thread Ken Giusti
At first I was a bit skeptical whether this really belongs in the messenger API, but I've come to accept that it would have to be. Internally, messenger does perform routing - mapping the 'to' address to the proper connection and link. To me, this new API provides a level of control over that

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-28 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote: Not to hijack this thread, but... Yes, absolutely - this is a Must Have as far as I'm concerned. Specifically: 1) The application should control whether Reply-to is set or not (currently always set by messenger) 2) The

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-278) Messenger - allow the application to control the use of the message reply-to field.

2013-03-28 Thread Ken Giusti (JIRA)
Ken Giusti created PROTON-278: - Summary: Messenger - allow the application to control the use of the message reply-to field. Key: PROTON-278 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-278 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-278) Messenger - allow the application to control the use of the message reply-to field.

2013-03-28 Thread Ted Ross (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13616324#comment-13616324 ] Ted Ross commented on PROTON-278: - An alternative API is to add a method on the

Re: Defining the behaviour of Proton Engine API under error conditions

2013-03-28 Thread Phil Harvey
On 28 March 2013 13:17, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 March 2013 02:45, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Defining the behaviour of Proton Engine API under error conditions

2013-03-28 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote: On 28 March 2013 13:17, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 March 2013 02:45, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-223) Need system-level and soak tests to exercise Proton.

2013-03-28 Thread Ken Giusti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Giusti resolved PROTON-223. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.5

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-279) cmake tests don't actually fail even when python tests are failing

2013-03-28 Thread Rafael H. Schloming (JIRA)
Rafael H. Schloming created PROTON-279: -- Summary: cmake tests don't actually fail even when python tests are failing Key: PROTON-279 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-279

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTON-279) cmake tests don't actually fail even when python tests are failing

2013-03-28 Thread Ken Giusti (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Giusti resolved PROTON-279. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.5

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-28 Thread Alan Conway
On 03/28/2013 09:11 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: At first I was a bit skeptical whether this really belongs in the messenger API, but I've come to accept that it would have to be. Internally, messenger does perform routing - mapping the 'to' address to the proper connection and link. To me, this

Re: RFC: new routing functionality for messenger

2013-03-28 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:11:51PM -0400, Alan Conway wrote: I am starting to think we need a proton routing plug-in API so that different choices of routing rules, pattern matching, configuration files etc. can be implemented without baking one set of choices into messenger. Such a plugin API