[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-158) detach with invalid handle causes segfault

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim updated PROTON-158: -- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > detach with invalid handle causes segfault > --

Re: Local transactions support

I checked the qpid roadmap and saw that there is no transactions support for AMQP 1.0 even in latest release. Is it because of proton transactions support lack? Could anybody clarify the situation with transactions (local and distributed) in proton? -- View this message in context: http://qpid.

[jira] [Assigned] (PROTON-277) dynamic flag on source/target is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Giusti reassigned PROTON-277: - Assignee: Ken Giusti > dynamic flag on source/target is not handled correctly > -

[jira] [Assigned] (PROTON-81) Expose send/receive settle modes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Giusti reassigned PROTON-81: Assignee: Ken Giusti > Expose send/receive settle modes > > >

Re: Local transactions support

Proton supports local transactions AFAIK. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:07 AM, atarutin wrote: > I checked the qpid roadmap and saw that there is no transactions support for > AMQP 1.0 even in latest release. Is it because of proton transactions > support lack? Could anybody clarify the situation wit

Re: Local transactions support

If it does, how should I start transaction, commit or rollback? -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Local-transactions-support-tp7594523p7594602.html Sent from the Apache Qpid Proton mailing list archive at Nabble.com.