On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Darryl L. Pierce
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:46:34PM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > +1 Though, I was hoping we could avoid having to manually do things...
>
> So I have a working POC that assigns a Ruby object to a C struct in such
> a way as to keep t
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:04:57AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On the face of it this sounds like it could be quite brittle and probably
> more complicated than just forgetting about swig for the one pn_rubyref_t
> struct and wrapping it manually. Did you attempt the latter option at all?
Yes
Justin Ross created PROTON-808:
--
Summary: Binaries have their library locations stripped
Key: PROTON-808
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-808
Project: Qpid Proton
Issue Type: Bu
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:04:57AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On the face of it this sounds like it could be quite brittle and probably
> > more complicated than just forgetting about swig for the one pn_rubyref_t
> > struct and w
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:19:29AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:04:57AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > On the face of it this sounds like it could be quite brittle and probably
> > > more complic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295231#comment-14295231
]
Justin Ross commented on PROTON-808:
And this, which is really a worse problem:
{nofo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295304#comment-14295304
]
Jeff Ortel commented on PROTON-806:
---
This has proven to be difficult to reproduce. I'd
Why did you reject it then?
--Rafael
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:19:29AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:04:57AM -0500, Rafael Schlomin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295412#comment-14295412
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-807:
Commit 24
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295418#comment-14295418
]
Alan Conway commented on PROTON-807:
Fixed the decoding problem. Did not modify proton
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway closed PROTON-807.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Proton does not decode AMQP small long encoding correctly and does not use it.
> ---
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:06:44PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Why did you reject it then?
Reject it? I don't recall rejecting any option.
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://ww
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Darryl L. Pierce
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:06:44PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Why did you reject it then?
>
> Reject it? I don't recall rejecting any option.
>
I meant why did you post about the global array thing and not this. Is
there some rea
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:06:44PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Why did you reject it then?
Are you referring to this?
"Though, I was hoping we could avoid having to manually do things..."
What I meant was that I would like to keep the work within the confines
of the Swig code.
--
Darryl L
No, you posted about a POC involving keeping C references alive by putting
them in a global array. I then commented that it sounded like it could be
brittle and might be more complicated than just wrapping the pn_rubyref_t
struct manually and directly integrating with ruby gc. You then said you
had
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:10:28PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Darryl L. Pierce
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:06:44PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > Why did you reject it then?
> >
> > Reject it? I don't recall rejecting any option.
>
> I m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295593#comment-14295593
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-802:
Commit 3c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming resolved PROTON-802.
Resolution: Fixed
> Unicode strings passed in through python binding cause exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming reassigned PROTON-802:
--
Assignee: Rafael H. Schloming
> Unicode strings passed in through python bindin
Rafi,
I just checked in some skeleton code to explore a particular approach.
It avoids the intermediate objects we have in proton now (Ex FlowType.java)
Instead the Flow class is directly used by the encoding/decoding layer.
The Flow class uses java types as opposed to AMQP specific types, which
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu <
rajit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rafi,
>
> I just checked in some skeleton code to explore a particular approach.
> It avoids the intermediate objects we have in proton now (Ex FlowType.java)
> Instead the Flow class is directly used by the e
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu <
> rajit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Rafi,
> >
> > I just checked in some skeleton code to explore a particular approach.
> > It avoids the intermediate objects we have in proton n
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:46 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Do you have tracing turned on when they time out? With the protocol trace
> enabled the tests slow down enough that some of them don't finish before
> the various timeouts kick in.
Much more insidious. It turns out that if you use 0.0.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14296165#comment-14296165
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-807:
Commit a5
Steve Huston created PROTON-809:
---
Summary: Changes to build on AIX with IBM XL C
Key: PROTON-809
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-809
Project: Qpid Proton
Issue Type: Bug
The apache CI builds say I broke the proton build
https://builds.apache.org/job/Qpid-proton-c/492/consoleText
So of course I want to fix it. However the build output shows it never
even gets to running the tests. It looks like there is a configuration
problem at the build server. Anyone know ho
26 matches
Mail list logo
