[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-868) Make Pipelined ANONYMOUS authentication work with fallback SASL implementation

2015-05-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14540392#comment-14540392 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-868: Commit

Re: When pushing to the git repo, please avoid merge commits...

2015-05-12 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:10:59PM -0400, Alan Conway wrote: On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 09:36 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: master-branch $ git merge --ff-only task-branch That will refuse to merge unless the merge is a fast-forward, which is the simple copy my commits to the end of trunk

Re: When pushing to the git repo, please avoid merge commits...

2015-05-12 Thread Alan Conway
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 09:36 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:23:27AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: A request for all, please avoid doing merge commits on your Git repo. When these hit the shared repo it can cause Git to try and fix [1] the commit when rebasing.

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-868) Make Pipelined ANONYMOUS authentication work with fallback SASL implementation

2015-05-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14540448#comment-14540448 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-868: Commit

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:12:40AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: I made a bunch of line comments. Things appear to be working in the scaled back example except for one thing: when retrieving the record with pn_record_get the Swig wrapper returned is of type SWIG:TYPE_p_void rather than the

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-868) Make Pipelined ANONYMOUS authentication work with fallback SASL implementation

2015-05-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14540400#comment-14540400 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-868: Commit

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:10:54PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:12:40AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: I made a bunch of line comments. Things appear to be working in the scaled back example except for one thing: when retrieving the record with pn_record_get the

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-877) proton-c sasl client hangs on server pipeline

2015-05-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14540725#comment-14540725 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-877: Commit

Re: codec changes

2015-05-12 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 15:53 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: I believe where we ended up was standardizing on a single snprintf-style signature for all encode functions, i.e.: // always returns encoded size, never

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: Initial transport frame size 256 bytes

2015-05-12 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/25 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-827) Client binding for the go programming language.

2015-05-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14540952#comment-14540952 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-827: Commit

Re: Development workflow and release process [WAS: Concurrent Go API for proton is, erm, GO!]

2015-05-12 Thread Alan Conway
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 15:42 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: 1. For developing new language bindings (and really for any development work that will involve enough new stuff to have a noisy commit history) we use branches. This is already the case with the Ruby/C++/Python3 bindings,

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-827) Client binding for the go programming language.

2015-05-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14540958#comment-14540958 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-827: Commit

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:45:20AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Can you post an isolated reproducer with just your definition of pn_rbkey_t and a code version of the 5 steps that lead to the seg fault? On my PROTON-781-reactive-ruby-apis branch is an example named

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:44:41AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:45:20AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Can you post an isolated reproducer with just your definition of pn_rbkey_t

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Rafael Schloming
Can you post an isolated reproducer with just your definition of pn_rbkey_t and a code version of the 5 steps that lead to the seg fault? --Rafael On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:02:13PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:45:20AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Can you post an isolated reproducer with just your definition of pn_rbkey_t and a code version of the 5 steps that lead to the seg fault? On my

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:12:40AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: I made a bunch of line comments. Excellent, thanks for that. I'll update the code and reply with my results. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value

Re: Introducing the Ruby Reactive APIs

2015-05-12 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:44:41AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:45:20AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: