IIRC, the definition of the outgoing-window was largely motivated by the
need to express to receivers certain conditions under which they may be
required to settle deliveries in order to receive more. For example if an
implementation uses a fixed sized array to store deliveries, and this array
is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14616378#comment-14616378
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-881:
---
Github user prestona commented on the pull
Github user prestona commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/40#issuecomment-119125236
Closing as merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14616379#comment-14616379
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-881:
---
Github user prestona closed the pull
Github user prestona closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/40
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dcristoloveanu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/39
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14617258#comment-14617258
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-928:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14617261#comment-14617261
]
Bozo Dragojevic commented on PROTON-937:
I've commited the fix, but i still owe a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14617259#comment-14617259
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-937:
Commit
Bozo Dragojevic created PROTON-937:
--
Summary: LinkImpl.localOpen() does not initialize source and target
Key: PROTON-937
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-937
Project: Qpid Proton
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bozo Dragojevic resolved PROTON-928.
Resolution: Fixed
Cancellable tasks
-
Key: PROTON-928
yanfeng liu created PROTON-938:
--
Summary: Have APIs to know address of temporary queue created by
Proton-J program
Key: PROTON-938
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-938
Project: Qpid
GitHub user dcristoloveanu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/43
-Fix 2 Code Analysis warnings and a realloc failure
-Fix 2 Code Analysis warnings in iocp.c
-Fix one realloc leak and the fact that the realloc result was not checked.
This rippled
I just took 826 -- I think I can still re-create the test that found it.
Let me see if I can repro...
- Original Message -
Yay Rafi! Thanks!
A simple query of currently outstanding blocker JIRAs affecting 0.9+ shows only
three:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-826
Yay Rafi! Thanks!
A simple query of currently outstanding blocker JIRAs affecting 0.9+ shows only
three:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-826 (unassigned)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-923 (asticher)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-934 (rschloming)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael goulish reassigned PROTON-826:
--
Assignee: michael goulish
recent checkin causes frequent double-free or corruption
On 07/07/2015 07:22 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
IIRC, the definition of the outgoing-window was largely motivated by the
need to express to receivers certain conditions under which they may be
required to settle deliveries in order to receive more. For example if an
implementation uses a fixed
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2015 07:22 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
IIRC, the definition of the outgoing-window was largely motivated by the
need to express to receivers certain conditions under which they may be
required to settle deliveries in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14616749#comment-14616749
]
michael goulish commented on PROTON-826:
I see why I didn't follow this up
GitHub user gemmellr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/42
PROTON-936 session outgoing window handling
As discussed on the mailing lists [1], proton currently sets the outgoing
window to 0 in most cases (except when using Messenger), but then sends
I added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-935 as a blocker.
We need to either drop Java 6 or fix compilation.
I also added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-936 for the
session outgoing window stuff, with some initial changes for
discussion on
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-935:
-
Summary: proton-j compilation failure
Key: PROTON-935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-935
Project: Qpid Proton
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated PROTON-881:
--
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Improvement)
Proton-j reactor implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14616762#comment-14616762
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-936:
---
GitHub user gemmellr opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14616697#comment-14616697
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on PROTON-881:
---
Linking to PROTON-935
Proton-j reactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated PROTON-881:
--
Fix Version/s: 0.10
Proton-j reactor implementation
---
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-936:
-
Summary: update session outgoing window handling
Key: PROTON-936
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-936
Project: Qpid Proton
Issue Type:
On 7 July 2015 at 07:22, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
IIRC, the definition of the outgoing-window was largely motivated by the
need to express to receivers certain conditions under which they may be
required to settle deliveries in order to receive more. For example if an
Github user astitcher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/39#issuecomment-119227983
@dcristoloveanu - Sorry not to reply to your comments - for some reason I
got no email to tell me you had commented.
* If you change the PR I'll be happy
29 matches
Mail list logo
