Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3

2013-02-22 Thread Andrew Stitcher
[X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...

Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3

2013-02-22 Thread Cliff Jansen
[X ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final Cliff On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble > issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. > > Source is here: > -

Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3

2013-02-22 Thread Michael Goulish
All topology tests pass. Nihil obstat. Imprimatur. +1 - Original Message - From: "Rafael Schloming" To: proton@qpid.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:54:27 PM Subject: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3 Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues th

Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3

2013-02-22 Thread Ken Giusti
[X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final FYI: tested Centos-5 x86_64, proton-c build, proton-c unit tests, and install tested F17 x86_64, proton-c/proton-j/proton-jni unit tests pass (aside from PROTON-214) -K - Original Message - > Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with

Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3

2013-02-22 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0800, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble > issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. > > Source is here: > - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ > > Ja