ice of
> blocking vs non-blocking?
>
> I probably don't fully grasp the implications
>
> -K
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Rafael Schloming"
> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 9:23:20 AM
&
loming"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 9:23:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Heartbeat
>
> There is already a single per messenger timeout for blocking operations. It
> should be a pretty trivial patch to set that same value as the idle timeout
> on each c
out approach.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Tomáš Šoltys"
> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 3:04:34 AM
> > Subject: Re: Heartbeat
> >
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > I have just opened a new JIRA
Thanks Tomáš - I agree with a single per-messenger timeout approach.
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomáš Šoltys"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 3:04:34 AM
> Subject: Re: Heartbeat
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> I have just opened a
mas,
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Tomáš Šoltys"
> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:43:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: Heartbeat
> >
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > thanks for your answer.
> > And is there a way
Hi Tomas,
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomáš Šoltys"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:43:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Heartbeat
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> thanks for your answer.
> And is there a way how to set it for pn_messenger_
Hi Ken,
thanks for your answer.
And is there a way how to set it for pn_messenger_t
Thanks,
Tomas
2013/11/8 Ken Giusti
> Hi Tomas,
>
> The C implementation of proton allows you to set an idle time out for a
> connection as described in the AMQP 1.0 spec. This value is used to
> generate "nul
Hi Tomas,
The C implementation of proton allows you to set an idle time out for a
connection as described in the AMQP 1.0 spec. This value is used to generate
"null" frames (ie. frames with no bodies) on idle connections as to not expire
the timeout. The connection will be dropped if the loc
