Re: Proton 0.6 RC2

2013-12-19 Thread Rafael Schloming
I believe I've fixed this on trunk. Let me know if you still see the problem there. --Rafael On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote: Digging further into this, I see that Messenger is providing the subscription and the address before the dynamic-attach handshake is

Re: Proton 0.6 RC2

2013-12-19 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Frank Quinn fqu...@nyx.com wrote: Hi Rafael, Could we get PROTON-420 in there too? I attached a patch to the ticket which fixes, it's just for compiler warning prevention when compiling against proton with strict flags. I have applied a modified version of

Re: Proton 0.6 RC2

2013-12-19 Thread Frank Quinn
...@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Proton 0.6 RC2 On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Frank Quinn fqu...@nyx.com wrote: Hi Rafael, Could we get PROTON-420 in there too? I attached a patch to the ticket which fixes, it's just for compiler warning prevention when compiling against proton with strict flags. I have

Re: Proton 0.6 RC2

2013-12-18 Thread Ted Ross
Digging further into this, I see that Messenger is providing the subscription and the address before the dynamic-attach handshake is completed. It was my understanding that one or both of those calls would block until the name was resolved. -Ted On 12/18/2013 05:25 PM, Ted Ross wrote:

Re: Proton 0.6 RC2

2013-12-18 Thread Rafael Schloming
You're right, the address accessor is supposed to block until the address is available. It certainly looks like it's not doing that. I'll try to reproduce locally or failing that produce a debugging patch for you to try in your environment. --Rafael On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ted Ross