Hi all!
Since we are past 1.6.0 final i wonder when you will remove the
deprecated portion of the source.
Best,
Kjell Bublitz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post
So it's save to simply delete the section myself if i begin to write a
new application using 1.6.x?
On Jan 7, 2008 1:42 PM, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/01/2008, Kjell Bublitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Since we are past 1.6.0 final i wonder when you
On 6/25/07, Tobie Langel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
initialize is reserved, why not extends too - allowing the Class
constructor to automatically extend the new class by just looking at
the content of extends.
That's an interesting idea, Just rewrote below to better match the
rest of
Parent:
Please don't overuse the $ sign. It should be used for utilities and
nothing else. Don't mix it in other areas, such as classes.
Saying that, i still think it is good to introduce a parent property
.. To make it more convenient, name it parentClass. Easy to adopt
and no dollar.
Style:
I
On 6/25/07, Tobie Langel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, keep it lower-case and add an s so it reads better :)
Cow-Class extends Animal (and) includes Eatable, Breadable ...
Remember that the idea is to distinguish them easily from instance
methods, hence capitalizing or prepending a $
On 6/25/07, Tobie Langel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
still a no-go for me. Classnames are capitialized, methods and vars
are lowercase. Its always been that way in all the common coding
guidlines ..
But if you insist, what about an underscore instead?
In JS that's usually implies that
After getting rake to work ...
1) Makes sense: Yes, Surprised: No, seems like the next logical step,
Suggestion: see below
2) this.parent() .. the name parent is not tooo obvious tho, but i
couldn't think of a better one either. On first sight i thought you
mean this.parent() would refer
Thanks for the heads up. I've updated the CHM version.
On 3/20/07, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/07, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whilst this will be fixed, is there a central repository (CVS/SVN) for the
dox? If so, where? Not needing karma, just read
Wee. This is very well done. Thanks martin and please submit this. It's lovely
On 2/5/07, Martin Str�m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just about to submit a patch to trac so instead I bring it up
here for discussion.
Since we already have the Builder in script.aculo.us I don't think is
In case you like / need it. I have updated my CHM version of the API
docs and uploaded it to my webspace. The file is handcrafted so there
might be missing something. Please let me know if so. Either way, its
free, fun and handy. I have it open all the time.
Enjoy the file,
Regarding time calculations etc, here is something that i would like
to see being added:
http://burnfield.com/martin/2006/09/15/rails-time-extensions-ported-to-javascript/
Don't know from where i got that link but it's a great set of tools
when dealing with times. As the link says it's a port of
11 matches
Mail list logo
