[Prototype-core] Re: Form#request ...request

2009-02-15 Thread Mislav Marohnić
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 18:47, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote: That said, i still wanted an alternative to having to make two function calls to serve the purpose of one. That's why I suggested writing your own method. No one is suggesting that you should write #serialize + Ajax.Request

[Prototype-core] Re: Form#request ...request

2009-02-14 Thread joe t.
On Feb 13, 8:08 am, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote: i know that #writeAttribute isn't 100% reliable, which was part of the reason why i was looking for an alternative to it. How so? Ahhh, you got me there. i guess that wasn't a good phrasing. It should read more like i've seen

[Prototype-core] Re: Form#request ...request

2009-02-13 Thread joe t.
On Feb 12, 9:25 am, Mislav Marohnić mislav.maroh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 23:08, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote: i've had an ongoing need to make Form#request less dependent on the FORM's action attribute. The sole purpose of Form#request is to wrap an Ajax.Request

[Prototype-core] Re: Form#request ...request

2009-02-13 Thread Tobie Langel
i know that #writeAttribute isn't 100% reliable, which was part of the reason why i was looking for an alternative to it. How so? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post