Yeah, good point. i thought specifying the boolean might be more
reliable, but it doesn't hurt to leave it out.
-joe t.
On Jan 9, 8:05 am, evolutional t.ziegelbec...@gmail.com wrote:
another thing...
I recently used the Object.extend for the default options of a
class.
So I just thought
That's obviously not possible, for obvious backwards compatibility
issues.
Best,
Tobie
On Jan 9, 2:05 pm, evolutional t.ziegelbec...@gmail.com wrote:
another thing...
I recently used the Object.extend for the default options of a
class.
So I just thought would it not be simpler to use an
On Jan 7, 9:45 am, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote:
How would the core feel about a safe version of Object.extend?
Object.extend = function(destination, source, safe) {
safe = !!safe || false;
You don't really need this conversion - `` (the one that's in the
loop) already does it
http://gist.github.com/44308
I'd probably suggest another method, though, rather than adding a flag
to Object.extend.
Best,
Tobie
On Jan 7, 3:45 pm, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote:
How would the core feel about a safe version of Object.extend?
Object.extend = function(destination,
