I love the Form.request method. But in pursuit of Javascript-fu,
I've come up with an interesting (to me) idea. I often have a
situation where I'm hijacking a set of forms on a page, like anything
with the class 'new', and performing an Ajax request on the form.
Usually I would also
Done:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8951
On 7/11/07, jdalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Snap!
Tricky, they define it again for WebKit and IE.
Follow the info here :
http://www.prototypejs.org/contribute
and create a ticket 8)
You can post back here with a link to the ticket if you
I modified a similar ticket dealing with code in the same area:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8851
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to
I stumbled upon a href='http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/07/10/
javascript-frameworks-and-jsf/'this page/a which compares how
various JS frameworks interpret ':' inside a CSS selector function.
I don't know if it's easy to implement, but would definitely be a good
addition (as of now only jQuery
Have you tried *[id='myForm:myName']? That ought to work, though it
wouldn't surprise me if it did not.
A colon is a valid character in ID attributes, so it should be
supported. Part of me thinks that the attribute selector approach (if
it works) would be sufficient -- but another part of me
Alex, I like the class definition function method with the exception
of returning a hash. It seems like it ought to be one way or the
other. But then, I've never had any problem just going long-hand with
my class definitions.
One small quibble, I think it might be a little more clear were
Andrew,
I just did some quick testing
http://yura.thinkweb2.com/selectors-test/
(the results are printed into firebug console)
It looks like using attribute to reference such things pretty much
solves the problem : )
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Interesting...
I tried doing something like this some time ago...
Take a look at my implementation -
http://yura.thinkweb2.com/scripting/contextMenu/
maybe you'll find something useful
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Jul 11, 10:18 am, Jeff Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex, I like the class definition function method with the exception
of returning a hash. It seems like it ought to be one way or the
other. But then, I've never had any problem just going long-hand with
my class definitions.
