Gentlemen,
A set of questions related to inheritance in Prototype:
1. will there be virtual methods?
Like, if A is B's parent;
A has a() and b() methods;
B has only b();
oB is an instance of B.
So oB.a() to call A#a() with oB as execution context and
oB.b() to call B#b() with the same oB
These lines occur only once when loading the framework. The difference is
insignificant.
You're right. Yet readability and clarity is. Also, there's more
chance to make error in a concatenated space-containing sting, like
it's in lines #2368-2369, than in an array of strings.
$w('colSpan
regardless my bad english...
On Sep 3, 6:20 pm, Andrew Red [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentlemen,
A set of questions related to inheritance in Prototype:
1. will there be virtual methods?
Like, if A is B's parent;
A has a() and b() methods;
B has only b();
oB is an instance of B.
So
)) Okay, okay.
Your way. )
On Sep 3, 10:19 pm, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 9/3/07, Andrew Red [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, summing you up, each time before we have an vanilla array from the
spaces-delimited string we go through:
string - stack hop - stack hop - replace
Thanks. Must have searched here a little more. ) (but there's still no
solution in v1.6.0_rc0 )
On Sep 5, 6:19 am, jdalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Andrew,
I brought this up in May
07:http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/55...
Mislav Marohnić and Tobias
Will it be addressed, then?
On Sep 25, 5:05 pm, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 9/25/07, Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any particular reason why this remap has been introduced?
Yes. In certain browsers (WebKit, for one), the keycode property isn't
As can be noted by increasing the argument in String#times, execution
time slows down dramatically and makes logarithmically identical curve
(to one produced my String#times in FireFox), yet of doubled order
magnitude.
An alternative method for IE exists that makes use of array
concatenation.
To explain the subject line, I believe, the concept of JSON strings
should be described by the following formula:
eval(obj.toJSON()) - obj,
i.e. toJSON methods should return such a string from an object that if
evaluated, the result to be identical to that original object.
I believe, this
On Sep 26, 5:34 am, Tom Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Andrew Red wrote:
To explain the subject line, I believe, the concept of JSON strings
should be described by the following formula:
eval(obj.toJSON()) - obj,
i.e. toJSON methods should return such a string
