Thanks Joe, looks like it was just an oversight. We're in the process of fixing it.
-- T.J. On Sep 8, 1:01 pm, "joe t." <thooke...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for restoring examples. Even as i've used the library for almost > two years, i still occasionally need a refresher on some of the stuff > i don't use frequently. > > Kudos, T.J. > -joe t. > > On Sep 7, 6:54 am, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > As some of you know, I'm running through all of our old docs and > > merging them into the PDoc comments in the source, and I've run into a > > really common theme: Where methods are already documented in the > > source, it's usually a copy of the original documentation with any > > examples left out. > > > Why? (Brief) examples are a good thing in documentation! > > > I'm restoring most of them, adjusting some to be a little more clear, > > but somebody tell me if there's some strong reason for stripping them > > out. > > -- > > T.J. Crowder > > tj / crowder software / com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
