On 3/12/07, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a rails person at all. What do you mean by irregular inflections
list?
They maintain a list of irregular stuff, like octopus - octopi. The
framework also lets you specify your own irregular plurals or to save
uncountable words like
Aha! Very useful. But the list must be MASSIVE!!! and then different
languages use different rules.
With the comments made, I can see no need to add them to prototype,
though maybe the addCommas method could be useful for instances where
nicely formatted numbers is required.
On 13/03/07, Mislav
I would like to suggest a warning or note of importance be added to
the documentation on the usage of $$().
It should be noted in the documentation that, unlike other areas in
JavaScript, the $$() method actually cares what type of quoting you
use (ie single vs double quotes). The selector
On 3/13/07, AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the following will return nothing
var elems = $$(label[for='someId']);
In 1.5.1 it doesn't matter anymore, single or double quotes. That kinda
breaks W3C specs, but hey - rules are meant to be broken :)
But if the above query fails in 1.5.0
Marius Feraru a écrit :
Could you please explain why do you think this breaks W3C specs, as I cannot
see it, neither at level 3 [1], nor at level 2 [2]? TIA.
Indeed, this doesn't break the specs. Lexical scanning clearly states
that both single and double quotes can be used. Which is why I
I like the new Prototype.Browser for browser detection. As I am
working on a SVG application, I need to know WebKit version as webkit
version 420 does not handle SVG. It will be great to have something
like Prototype.Browser.WebkitVersion or even simplier
Prototype.Browser.Webkit could be 0 or
I like the new Prototype.Browser for browser detection. As I am
working on a SVG application, I need to know WebKit version as webkit
version 420 does not handle SVG. It will be great to have something
like Prototype.Browser.WebkitVersion or even simplier
Prototype.Browser.Webkit could be 0 or
