ke this
function a prototype of Object. Currently you use it like this:
Object.extend(someobj, { ... });
I would think it would be better to format it like this:
somobj.extend({ ... });
Simply curious why one way was chosen over the other. I don't really
have a preference, I'd d
> Actually that was exactly what Prototype did when it was young - augment
> Object.prototype. It was removed when Sam was convinced by Dean Edwards that
> it was really a bad thing. No JS library should ever touch Object.prototype;
> search on the web why (if you're interested).
>
> Now these met
I'm trying to set the style of elements that are created through
document.createElement() using the setStyle() function. Looks
something like this:
var newdiv = document.createElement('div');
newdiv.setStyle({
position: 'relative',
width: '100px'
...
});
$('someotherdiv').appendChild(newdi
oesn't automatically extend new elements based on their Javascript
> prototype
> even though it should since that's what prototype programming means. But oh
> well.
>
> --
> Michael Peters
> Developer
> Plus Three, LP
Ah, I get it. That works great. Thanks for you
