i don't know if this is intentional, or if no one's noticed it, or
what, but in the last two releases, i've had to add a fix to
Form.reset():
-- 1.6.0.2/3:
var Form = {
reset: function(form) {
$(form).reset();
return form;
},
-- My fix:
var Form = {
reset: function(form) {
That's kinda odd. i've tried the code i suggested above with no
problems. i guess there could be potential problems with it, but i
didn't see any specific problems with particular browsers described.
For now i'll stick to what i've got and wait for the official fix in
a later version.
-joe t
not entirely
sure why Firefox is forgiving this and supposedly obeying the Top
insertion, it's probably why IE isn't.
On that note, what exactly is going wrong? Looking at the page in FF
and IE8b2 (normal and compatibility modes), there don't seem to be any
display issues, and no JS errors.
-joe t
)
That kind of organization would have definitely come in very handy
when i first played with Prototype. Hell, i ended up rewriting
hundreds of lines of code when i finally grasped Function.bind(). My
next effort is understanding event delegation. i guess i like learning
in reverse.
-joe t
defined. i imagine there would be some minimal performance hit
testing each property if safe==true, but otherwise...? Any visible
problems?
Just a suggestion, it helped me out.
-joe t.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Yeah, good point. i thought specifying the boolean might be more
reliable, but it doesn't hurt to leave it out.
-joe t.
On Jan 9, 8:05 am, evolutional t.ziegelbec...@gmail.com wrote:
another thing...
I recently used the Object.extend for the default options of a
class.
So I just thought
Oh good god, how did i miss that???
Thanks for that!
-joe t.
On Jan 14, 10:50 am, Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi.
I've just reduced a fairly long winded each() loop to ...
var i_LargestLabel = $$(s_CSS).invoke('getWidth').max();
So, this is just a thank you to all
On Feb 12, 9:25 am, Mislav Marohnić mislav.maroh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 23:08, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote:
i've had an ongoing need to make Form#request less dependent on the
FORM's action attribute.
The sole purpose of Form#request is to wrap an Ajax.Request
calls.
It was just a hypothetical, i'm not trying to twist anyone's arms off
over it. :)
-joe t.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core
Rick,
Maybe i'm missing how that revision works, but it appears to me that
your stop property doesn't actually stop the repeater. Your stop
returns before further execution happens, but the timeout ID for the
window still exists.
What am i missing?
-joe t.
On Jun 24, 12:20 pm, Rick Waldron
()===false) // MOD
this.stop(); // NEW
} catch(e) {
/* empty catch for clients that don't support try/finally */
}
finally {
this.currentlyExecuting = false;
}
}
}
Just tossing in my 2 cents because i'm intrigued by that feature.
-joe t.
On Jun 26
clicked.
Otherwise, the documentation itself is phenomenal, and thanks to all!
-joe t.
On Apr 5, 5:19 pm, Joost joost.van.do...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem, because I like to use google to search for
stuff in the documentation but I end up on the old one. Also I think
the mouse
Agreed, and it appears to be specific to Firefox. However, i can't
recall any other circumstances (iframe, CSS overflow, etc) where the
scroll bar behaves differently. The new API page is the only time i've
seen this behavior. Peculiar.
Oh well, it's hardly the end of the world. :)
-joe t
existing content, place new content at the
desired Position (usually appended, but insertion options are
available).
http://api.prototypejs.org/dom/element/insert/
This same question came up some months ago. Hopefully that
clarification helps.
-joe t.
On Jul 2, 5:24 am, Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha
the containers you need to
preserve to some other, hidden, parent container before placing the
new content.
Sorry i wasn't more helpful. i'm a little rusty of late, being pressed
for more C# development than web work lately. i hope one of the big-
brains here can take a look and offer something for you.
-joe t
detract from its usefulness as a quick utility function.
Maybe the devs have some ideas for broadening the capabilities for it,
though.
-joe t.
On Aug 12, 8:51 pm, Rafael Raposo orapo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I don't know what you think about border radius right now, but as it is not
totally
to. /shrug
-joe t.
On Aug 13, 1:09 pm, Rafael Raposo orapo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, unfortunately I know it can't go into the core as it does not support
IE.
But, the two value radius is accepted by this function of mine. I just
didn't know it existed =).
If you call $(id_elemente
17 matches
Mail list logo
