[Prototype-core] Re: Function.prototype.bind optimization

2009-02-16 Thread Yaffle


Hm i am stupid.., why this ticket is for  1.6.0.3 milestone?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Prototype-core] Re: Function.prototype.bind optimization

2009-02-16 Thread Yaffle

Good!
My searching it on lighthouse was not succeful...



kangax:
> On Feb 16, 8:56 am, Yaffle  wrote:
> > Function.prototype.bind may work 2 times faster, if when calling bind
> > with one argument,it would return function without "arg.concat"
> >
> >   bind: function() {
> >     if (arguments.length < 2 && Object.isUndefined(arguments[0]))
> > return this;
> >     var __method = this, args = $A(arguments), object = args.shift();
> >         if(arg.length)
> >       return function() {
> >         return __method.apply(object, concat($A(arguments)));
> >       };
> >     return function(){
> >       return __method.apply(object, $A(arguments));
> >     };
> >   }
> >
> > P.S.  bind function used with one argument very frequently
>
> Similar optimization was already done few months ago
> http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/215-optimize-bind-bindaseventlistener
>
> --
> kangax
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Prototype-core] Re: Function.prototype.bind optimization

2009-02-16 Thread kangax

On Feb 16, 8:56 am, Yaffle  wrote:
> Function.prototype.bind may work 2 times faster, if when calling bind
> with one argument,it would return function without "arg.concat"
>
>   bind: function() {
>     if (arguments.length < 2 && Object.isUndefined(arguments[0]))
> return this;
>     var __method = this, args = $A(arguments), object = args.shift();
>         if(arg.length)
>       return function() {
>         return __method.apply(object, concat($A(arguments)));
>       };
>     return function(){
>       return __method.apply(object, $A(arguments));
>     };
>   }
>
> P.S.  bind function used with one argument very frequently

Similar optimization was already done few months ago
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/215-optimize-bind-bindaseventlistener

--
kangax
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Prototype-core] Re: Function.prototype.bind optimization

2009-02-16 Thread Yaffle

Sorry, It's not bind optimization.
It's optimization of function returned by "bind".

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---