Wherever it makes sense, Prototype follows Ruby's general philosophy,
and that includes naming scheme. If the most confusing result is that
someone expects "unique" instead of "uniq," that's a gambit I'm
willing to make. A developer would immediately know what "uniq" means
upon reading documentati
Except that many users of Prototype don't use Ruby.
On Aug 4, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Mislav Marohnić
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Ken Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unique might be specified array method in JavaScript 2.0--otherwise,
> yes, "unique" is more intuitive than "uniq".
>
On 8/1/07, Ken Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Unique might be specified array method in JavaScript 2.0--otherwise,
> yes, "unique" is more intuitive than "uniq".
"uniq" is Ruby. IMO, there's no need to alias "unique" to it
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receiv
Tom Gregory wrote:
> You may want to check out Prototype's "uniq" function.
> http://prototypejs.org/api/array/uniq
>
> ... and to the core dev's.. maybe this deserves an alias?
>
>
> TAG
> ...
I was thinking maybe "unique" was a reserved word but I don't see it on
the list of reserved words
(ht
You may want to check out Prototype's "uniq" function.
http://prototypejs.org/api/array/uniq
... and to the core dev's.. maybe this deserves an alias?
TAG
On Jul 31, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Tom Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I enhanced 1.4.3 for db.etree.org. Among my changes i
