Re: Risky delay (was: Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype / IE6 issue (bug?))

2010-11-18 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi, In the case of ie6, with less than 5% of all page views (and rapidly declining), it is now a footnote so why support it at all? stats here:http://mashable.com/2010/06/01/ie6-below-5-percent/ As is frequently the case, it's more complicated than that. :-) StatCounter may say less than 5%

Re: Risky delay (was: Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype / IE6 issue (bug?))

2010-11-18 Thread Phil Petree
It may be 20% but realistically, for most web sites, how many users come from those other countries? Like Martin said earlier, its rarely worth the effort to add advanced features into ie6 sessions as you risk breaking too much stuff in other, more significant browsers. I look at one of my

Re: Risky delay (was: Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype / IE6 issue (bug?))

2010-11-18 Thread RobG
On Nov 18, 8:06 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: On Nov 17, 2:07 pm, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, In the case of ie6, with less than 5% of all page views (and rapidly declining), it is now a footnote so why support it at all? The OP's issue has nothing to

Re: Risky delay (was: Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype / IE6 issue (bug?))

2010-11-18 Thread Ryan Gahl
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:26 PM, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote: Using onclick or onchange for a select element is a bad choice No, using onchange is actually the correct choice. He's using onclick on option elements instead of onchange (again, the correct event) on the select element. --

Re: Risky delay (was: Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype / IE6 issue (bug?))

2010-11-18 Thread Ryan Gahl
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Ryan Gahl ryan.g...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:26 PM, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote: Using onclick or onchange for a select element is a bad choice No, using onchange is actually the correct choice. He's using onclick on option elements