Matt Foster wrote:
[...]
To address the wrong order issue, you could create a queue of
requests such that each request is asynchronous but stacked such that
it will not be sent until the previous request has returned. I've
written something for this for prototype 1.5 as Ajax.RequestQueue
as a bonus, in the case of my problem, I don't even need to tag
requests with a uniqid or serial, as I know that I'm only interested
in responses to requests where the search string was the same as the
current form field value.
On Mar 20, 9:26 am, Szymon Wilkołazki wilkola...@gmail.com wrote:
I've now found a solution to this problem, as follows:
var inputControlCapturedValue = inputControl.getValue();
new Ajax.Request(xhrRequestUrl, {
method: 'get',
parameters: {
table:
I've got to add my two cents as well,
For addressing the issue of attaching parameters to the Ajax.Request
object, they're actually available in the callbacks. Each callback
gets sent an Ajax.Response instance which contains the request
property which in turn has the parameters property,
Thanks for that link Alex.
However, as I've tried to proceed with this, I keep coming back to
needing answers to my two original questions. Can anyone assist?
The questions:
- Which callback will allow me to intercept Ajax.updater at this
point? Will this even work with Ajax.updater, or do I
Can you report the question again as it seems to be missing
Thanks
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Jonny Nott jonn...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:57 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Updater home
The response does not have access to the request. I created the ticket
for this a long time ago, but I can't establish if there is any
memleak when the response includes the request.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9691
Over a year old ticket.
2009/3/11 Jonny Nott jonn...@gmail.com:
2009/3/11 Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com:
The response does not have access to the request. I created the ticket
for this a long time ago, but I can't establish if there is any
memleak when the response includes the request.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9691
Over a year old
webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 7:21 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Updater home-brew autocompletion timing
issue
there is a completely easier way to do what you want and save memory on
the
client side
