@RobG:
> ...just for the record: the HTML class
> attribute is not targeted at CSS, it is for any purpose you wish to
> put it to (even none at all).
Good point!
@All:
I went ahead and rewrote this as a tip on the unofficial wiki, but it
could use another pair of eyes and I'm out of time this
On Oct 14, 5:07 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> One way to do this is to have the relevant fields tagged with a
> specific CSS class.
An excellent response overall, but just for the record: the HTML class
attribute is not targeted at CSS, it is for any purpose you wish to
On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:07 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
> So in that situation, we
> don't want the HTML designers to have to do much to enable the
> JavaScript, and we don't want the JavaScript coders to know that much
> about the HTML. We want them both to have an agreed set of things
> they each pro
Hi Juan,
Let's step back a moment and remember *why* we want to have minimally-
intrusive JavaScript in our pages: Separation of concerns. In a
decent-sized shop, the JavaScript coders are not the same people as
the HTML designers. Each is a distinct skillset, and a shop that's
big enough is s
