[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype Vs. JQuery
Hello, For me the problem is actualy Why are you using Prototype when jQuery is more efficient, intuitive et en plus more developed? And remember you, jQuery accept other library with .noConflict() And you can manage RoR with jQuery http://jimneath.org/2008/06/18/using-jquery-with-ruby-on-rails.html So for me try to do something with Proto is a challenge because jQuery is so smart. cordialy LV On 1 mai, 02:45, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote: The short answer is that there's no short answer. There's not really anything that either library can do that the other can't. It's mostly a question of the requirements of the project, or familiarity with either library's approach, etc. There's no conclusive answer any answer you do get will be loaded with facts about each, but no single knockout argument to use one or the other. -joe t. On Apr 29, 2:22 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote: Why Prototype over JQuery? I am an avid fan of Prototype and have never used JQuery, but JQuery seems to be so popular. Is it just that, popular? I love prototype, and learning something new and magical every day it seems, but is there something *better* that Prototype does that JQuery doesn't, or vice-a-versa? Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: prototype.js with jquery-1.3.2.min.js is not working.
hi,
the prototype's library is pretentieuse so the others must do the
work
bibliotheque
conflit de library
//---jQuery
bien definir l'espace de jQuery:
jQuery(function($) {
//la function
});
jQuery.noConflict();
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
$('.infiniteCarousel').infiniteCarousel();
});
- source:
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js
//---Mootools
Pas de solution pour l'instant sauf transformer tout les identifiants
//---Protopype-scriptaculos
script type=text/javascript language=javascript
// ![CDATA[
$('element_id').appear();
// ]]
/script
On 4 jan, 22:18, Mence olgaysa...@gmail.com wrote:
hi.
i must to use : prototype.js with jquery-1.3.2.min.js
(http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/files/jquery-1.3.2.min.js) .
but it is not working.
can you help me plase ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: yes, but Mootoolls do that -ImageMenu-
Hi, Yes is like a vertical accordion and this .v2 seems to me a very well soluce with mouse action. Thanks very much for comments and recommendation let's go to script Friendly, LV On Aug 25, 10:25 pm, Jarkko Laine jarks...@gmail.com wrote: On 25.8.2009, at 23.16, lvdesign wrote: Hi, Thank you for this base of soluce. So, I begin with a slide menu picture witch using these Effects (move and morph) to anime. I thought with the .js of Moot, we could transposing with the right verbose in proto/scriptaculous. But this library is perhaps just to limited for this kind of animation? Google for scriptaculous accordion and you'll find plenty of existing solutions. Like Alex mentioned, you might need to modify the one you choose a bit to work onmouseover instead of onclick, but that shouldn't take a whole lot of time. Cheers, //jarkko -- Jarkko Lainehttp://jlaine.nethttp://dotherightthing.comhttp://www.railsecommerce.comhttp://odesign.fi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: yes, but Mootoolls do that -ImageMenu-
Hi, Thank you for this base of soluce. So, I begin with a slide menu picture witch using these Effects (move and morph) to anime. I thought with the .js of Moot, we could transposing with the right verbose in proto/scriptaculous. But this library is perhaps just to limited for this kind of animation? Sincerly, LV On Aug 25, 7:57 pm, Andy Daykin daykina...@gmail.com wrote: The Effect.Move and Effect.Morph could probably do the trick. From: Alex McAuley Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:56 PM To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: yes, but Mootoolls do that -ImageMenu- Its just an accordian that uses mouseover/out Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com - Original Message - From: DJ Mangus To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:58 PM Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: yes, but Mootoolls do that -ImageMenu- Would be doable with script.aculo.us though I do not think anyone has done it yet. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:41 AM, lvdesign mail...@lvdesign.com.fr wrote: Hello people, I find a very fancy animation, but i am not sure that we can transpose it with prototype. this is the file:http://www.phatfusion.net/imagemenu/ I don't find the coresponding's effects in scriptaculous lib. Or perhaps it's a combination. If someone has an idea, it will be great, meme if a piste... thanks a lot LV --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: compatibility prototype_scriptaculos et mootools
Thanks Richard for this proposition but i knew it and it's a very good
solution.
But i search a no_flash solution, only .js and the prototype function
sound is apparently the only one.
Merci, cordialement.
On Jul 24, 3:30 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/7/23 lvdesign mail...@lvdesign.com.fr:
Thanks for the messsage and you know what? i am very happy to know
that! (sic)
but where i can find an clever library with sound.js? i must created
it?
bye, bye and merci encore.
On Jul 23, 8:29 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Mootools and Prototype are unfortunately totally incompatible.
You'll have to choose one or the other.
Best,
Tobie
On Jul 23, 6:10 pm, lvdesign mail...@lvdesign.com.fr wrote:
Hi, i am new french member. So i hope you could understand my
question.
I use several .js library for a site's development and i have a
conflict between prototype and mootools.
I resolve the problem with Jquery and proto like that:
//--pour jQuery
jQuery(function($) {
//functionDoSomething
});
jQuery.noConflict()
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
$('.functionDoSomething').functionDoSomething();
});
//
I would like only use sound.js of prototype. [ Not another library
propose this fonctionality(?)]
How can i do to resolve the $ conflict ?
thanks a lot for the answer
Merci d'avance pour une réponse
I use the SoundManager [1]
Doesn't require prototype.
[1]http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/
--
-
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer :http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498r=213474731
Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!
ZOPA :http://uk.zopa.com/member/RQuadling
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] compatibility prototype_scriptaculos et mootools
Hi, i am new french member. So i hope you could understand my
question.
I use several .js library for a site's development and i have a
conflict between prototype and mootools.
I resolve the problem with Jquery and proto like that:
//--pour jQuery
jQuery(function($) {
//functionDoSomething
});
jQuery.noConflict()
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
$('.functionDoSomething').functionDoSomething();
});
//
I would like only use sound.js of prototype. [ Not another library
propose this fonctionality(?)]
How can i do to resolve the $ conflict ?
thanks a lot for the answer
Merci d'avance pour une réponse
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: compatibility prototype_scriptaculos et mootools
Thanks for the messsage and you know what? i am very happy to know
that! (sic)
but where i can find an clever library with sound.js? i must created
it?
bye, bye and merci encore.
On Jul 23, 8:29 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Mootools and Prototype are unfortunately totally incompatible.
You'll have to choose one or the other.
Best,
Tobie
On Jul 23, 6:10 pm, lvdesign mail...@lvdesign.com.fr wrote:
Hi, i am new french member. So i hope you could understand my
question.
I use several .js library for a site's development and i have a
conflict between prototype and mootools.
I resolve the problem with Jquery and proto like that:
//--pour jQuery
jQuery(function($) {
//functionDoSomething
});
jQuery.noConflict()
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
$('.functionDoSomething').functionDoSomething();
});
//
I would like only use sound.js of prototype. [ Not another library
propose this fonctionality(?)]
How can i do to resolve the $ conflict ?
thanks a lot for the answer
Merci d'avance pour une réponse
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
