2008/11/5 kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 4, 11:37 am, James Hoddinott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm not entirely sure if this is a bind issue, a defer issue or
something else that I'm unaware of.
The scenario is this; the page loads, when this is done an
Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater call is
James. I would suggest running a different listener on the 'li.clickinc'
elements ... try something like this ..
Event.observe(window,'load',function() {
$$('li.clickinc').invoke('observe','click',function(e) {
$('dmain').update('Updated text after clicking on '+this.id);
});
If I have an element:
span id='foo'50/span
Should I be able to say the following?
var total = parseFloat($('foo'));
Instead, I am getting a return value of:
[object HTMLSpanElement]
and parseFloat is returning NaN.
Thanks in advance.
2008/11/6 Alex Mcauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
James. I would suggest running a different listener on the 'li.clickinc'
elements ... try something like this ..
Event.observe(window,'load',function() {
$$('li.clickinc').invoke('observe','click',function(e) {
$('dmain').update('Updated
You need to get the contents of the element as $('foo') is the element
itself ..
innerHTML or innerTEXT should work ...
var total=$('foo').innerTEXT;
alert(parseFloat(total));
- Original Message -
From: Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
Try:
var total = parseFloat($('foo').innerHTML);
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 03:06, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I have an element:
span id='foo'50/span
Should I be able to say the following?
var total = parseFloat($('foo'));
Instead, I am getting a return value of:
[object
Hi Victor,
It depends entirely on what you're calling and how it's expecting to
receive them. When calling an element's observe() method, for
instance, this works:
myelement.observe('click', function(evt) { /* ... */ });
...but this doesn't:
myelement.observe({
eventName:
Hi,
Thank you for your respons.
Yes I know this possibility. I though about it, but I can not use
it... and I don't think the bind problem will be fix in that way ;)
Because, if in your example, if I take the module-0 code and put it
down between the 1 and 2. The binds will be broken too, aren't
Hi guys and gals ... today i am building a lazyLoader based on prototype
Its already working except i assumed i could do a synchronous request so
nothing further in the javascript function is executed untill the request
has finished ... it seems that asynchronous : false; is not wokring
Hi,
Yes I know this possibility. I though about it, but I can not use
it... and I don't think the bind problem will be fix in that way ;)
I'm pretty sure it will. Did you try it? I did a trivial test, and
it worked fine. Here's my version of moveDown, which differs slightly
from Rob's as
Alex,
For some reason your message came in as being in someone else's
thread. Did you by any chance post to the group by clicking Reply
in your email client (or in the GGroups web interface) and just
changing the subject line? If so, please don't do that, GGroups is
picking up the thread ID
Not quite sure how to phrase this. I am a new scriptaculous user, I
am comfortable using scriptaculous and prototype when I use the demos
as a basis for what I am doing. However, I am working on adding ajax
capabilities into a CMS that I have built. In some instances I have
set a div with a
i want it to be transparent hence the syncronous request ... so the function
that calls the dependencies waits to continue untill the scripts that it
requires are loaded
I have it inserting a script into the dom properly but if i try to call the
function in the test script it doesnt work
you can observe the window to load and set a timeout to execute Effect.Fade
Regards
Alex
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:34 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Setting a
2008/11/6 T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
So you might consider event delegation instead. Put your click
handler on the dticketlist element, and you don't have to do
*anything* to hook up the individual ticket items: Events bubble up
the DOM tree, and so a click on the ticket will
Hi James,
Glad to help. One note:
...I hadn't realised that you could
assign the 'click' to the holding div and it would be applied to the
elements below it.
Well, it's not really that it's *applied* to the elements below it.
It's just that when an event is fired on an element (e.g., it's
Does anyone know who to contact about the contacting the www.prototypejs.org
site
Thanks
Don T
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi,
If you see an error, probably best to file a ticket in Lighthouse;
details here[1]. Even if it's not specifically the docs but (say) a
broken link, that'll get routed to someone who can edit the site.
Otherwise, anything we can help with here? The Core guys and various
contributors tend
Hey,
I've been looking for AJAX file upload script tutorials using
Prototype, but didn't find anything about it. Actually, there isn't
really a lot of sorting in case you're looking for AJAX file upload
with none usage of Prototype.
Could you, folks, help me with this problem?
Hi Alex,
I could be completely misreading that code, and if I am, apologies in
advance. It *looks* like you're trying to create a queue where you'll
only load one script file at a time, and that you're first downloading
each script via Ajax.Request and then separately appending a script
tag to
Hi,
You're right !!!
It works fine... Perfect, thank you so much. I though the fault was
comming from the innerHTML way, but I hasn't known about this next/
insert thing.
I think I'm not so good in JavaScript ;)
Just a test file : http://www.letroquet.eu/tests/module_inverse.html
Now, I have to
yes thanks for the reply, i have removed evalScripts, i only put it in for a
second to test i am going to put in a timeout to pause the script
before it continues to return back to the function that calls it and see if
that akes a difference ... if not i will go the async way and put a
yes...this is my question
Or are you asking which style to use when you're defining your own
functions and classes?
Both ways should be doing the same things...but what I want to know is
what is the prototypejs developer will suggest us to use.
On Nov 6, 8:52 pm, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL
you cannot upload or download files with an XHR its impossible
- Original Message -
From: Uzm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] AJAX file upload using Prototype
That's not quite true:
http://www.seemysites.net/projFolder/uploader/
On Nov 6, 5:45 pm, Alex Mcauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you cannot upload or download files with an XHR its impossible
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
I'm using a div with overflow:hidden wrapped around another div that I
move left and right (using Effect.Move) to create a scroll area
effect.
However, when the inner div which is being moved has an absolute (or
relative) position applied to it it decides that it wants to ignore
the
you cannot upload or download files with an XHR its impossible
That's not quite true:
Yes, it is -- as far as it goes. (XHR can't do it, full stop.) But
as you pointed out with your link, XHR not being able to do it doesn't
mean you can't do cool things *other* ways. :-) If you can do the
Anyway, do you have a solution do that please ??
div id='one'One/div
div id='two'Two/div
Then
div id='one'Two/div
div id='two'One/div
???
Or maybe
div id='position_one'div ='module_one'One/div/div
div id='position_two'div ='module_two'Two/div/div
Then
div id='position_one'div
I'm using Ajax.Request and receive a text/javascript content-type, but
sometimes I make a syntax error in my javascript. The error is now
silently ignored (at least that's what I think). Using firebug it
doesn't show in my console window.
new Ajax.Request('myscript.php', {
Hi!
I developped a webpage for my string quartet, and as i had so many
problems with IE i did 2 versions. I'll fuse them when both are ready.
A version for non IE browsers:
http://cuartetotoldra.com/toldrismo/prueba3enhanced.html
and another one just for IE:
What are the drawbacks of requestings the JS file via Ajax.Request and
stuffing the responseText inside the innerHTML property of a generated
script element?
Does it have the global scope restriction like eval?
Does it cause a processing bottle neck for the client?
Is it supported by all
I'm not experiencing the problem you describe. In IE the menu effect
is quite smooth.
On Nov 6, 2:06 pm, jrmout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I developped a webpage for my string quartet, and as i had so many
problems with IE i did 2 versions. I'll fuse them when both are ready.
A version
i wanted to build my own for POC and because i dont want it bloated ...
- Original Message -
From: buda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:17 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Building a lazy Loader
not sure on the drawbacks but i have had a good idea ... i am going to write
a function to the bottom of the file and test it for calling.. once its
callable then the file is ready in the dom and can be used
- Original Message -
From: Matt Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype
I have a file upload widget working perfectly on Safari 3 and Firefox
2 (both on Mac), and Firefox 3 on XP but dying horribly on IE6 SP3 on
XP.
Dying horribly is probably a bit harsh, the upload part works fine,
and I am able to remove the stale file inputs from my layout, but I
can't
On Nov 7, 12:24 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes I know this possibility. I though about it, but I can not use
it... and I don't think the bind problem will be fix in that way ;)
I'm pretty sure it will. Did you try it? I did a trivial test, and
it worked fine.
On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
[snip]
The filesList reference works, and I know that the element is being
extended, because the remove() part works correctly. But no matter
what I try to insert into filesList later (I even tried with a simple
lihowdy/li to see if
On Nov 7, 12:52 am, Alex Mcauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i want it to be transparent hence the syncronous request
Blocking the UI is hardly transparent.
The lazy loading of scripts is a flawed strategy - it seems a good
idea but if you think about the issues, you should realise that you'll
On Nov 7, 5:45 am, Matt Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the drawbacks of requestings the JS file via Ajax.Request and
stuffing the responseText inside the innerHTML property of a generated
script element?
It is not reliable across browsers, nor is assigning the source as a
string
39 matches
Mail list logo
