Via Google search, I found this answer today here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/278122/how-to-force-javascript-to-execute-within-html-response-to-ajax-request
I have it half working. What I mean is, my response text comes back
and updates my div perfectly with the HTML when evalScripts:
Hey there,
Wanted to say thanks for all your help here.
The links especially.
I am still very new at all this and it's a lot to get my head around.
That site is excellent.
sk
On Sep 22, 4:53 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
You're taking the return value of `new
Hi,
Sorry, I missed out an opening bracket. Should have been:
function replace_weather_table(){
zoomy = map.getZoom();
new Ajax.Request('/weather/update_weather_tables?zoom='+zoomy, {
// ^--
this was missing
I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
switches to other code). Please look at the following barebones
example that illustrates the issue:
//=
function doAjax() {
console.info('making request');
new Ajax.Request(
url, {
onSuccess:
If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then you
will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, JoJo tokyot...@gmail.com wrote:
I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
switches to other code). Please
I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
off by B's instantiation.
On Sep 24, 12:44 pm, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then you
will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
On Fri, Sep
Are other people seeing issues with script.aculo.us' drag and drop in
the latest beta of IE 9? I know what to do about this is a bit
complicated because it might be their bug. But we also don't want a
core feature like that not working when it gets released.
--
You received this message
Hi,
Are other people seeing issues with script.aculo.us' drag and drop in
the latest beta of IE 9? I know what to do about this is a bit
complicated because it might be their bug. But we also don't want a
core feature like that not working when it gets released.
we've encountered that
I believe I solved the problem. I had a queue of work orders. One of
these work orders queued up another work order, so it was a nested
AJAX request - BAD IDEA!
On Sep 24, 12:56 pm, JoJo tokyot...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
off by B's
Same difference.
Since the AJAX calls are Async you have no control over what gets completed
first or what gets interrupted by what.
If script a does a complex query taking 2.2 seconds and returns a large data
set while script b does a simple query that takes .02 seconds and returns
100 bytes,
On Aug 27, 5:43 am, Johan Arensman johanm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm fully against marquee's in the first place but you also have an option
to add the attribute data-duration to your element. If you're making a class
to replace a depricated functionality you shouldn't use this way to add
features
11 matches
Mail list logo
