The author of coffeescript mentioned on this thread (http://github.com/
jashkenas/coffee-script/issues/issue/675/#issue/675/comment/402197)
that ie leaks memory if you use named functions, instead of closures.
If this is true, why does Prototype uses some of these (such as
function $A on
Hi,
The author of coffeescript mentioned on this thread (http://github.com/
jashkenas/coffee-script/issues/issue/675/#issue/675/comment/402197)
that ie leaks memory if you use named functions, instead of closures.
IE doesn't leak memory if you use named functions (or at least, I've
never
Thanks for the thorough reply.
On Sep 27, 6:13 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
The author of coffeescript mentioned on this thread (http://github.com/
jashkenas/coffee-script/issues/issue/675/#issue/675/comment/402197)
that ie leaks memory if you use named functions,
On 24 Sep., 21:58, tazz_ben b...@wbpsystems.com wrote:
Are other people seeing issues with script.aculo.us' drag and drop in
the latest beta of IE 9?
Yes. After updating the Platform Preview to version 5
(1.9.7930.16406) today, I encountered that problem too. Not sure, but
former tests with
Hi folks,
I was able to reinstall an older version of IE9 PP (1.9.7916.6000) but
it also raises the drag'n'drop problem. I start started debugging and
found the following (Prototype version 1.6.1, Scriptaculous v1.8.3):
script.aculo.us will start dragging only if you pressed the left
button (for
