[Proto-Scripty] Re: The order of iteration with Hash objects.

2011-10-06 Thread T.J. Crowder
On Oct 5, 2:39 pm, Shane McCarron halindr...@gmail.com wrote: If the sorted order of the hash keys isn't what you want, you might also consider assigning ordinals as part of the hash key.  Assuming you have less than 1 hash keys, I would do something like _myKey as a key, where is

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: The order of iteration with Hash objects.

2011-10-06 Thread Shane McCarron
Yes. Of course. On Oct 6, 2011 10:54 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: On Oct 5, 2:39 pm, Shane McCarron halindr...@gmail.com wrote: If the sorted order of the hash keys isn't what you want, you might also consider assigning ordinals as part of the hash key. Assuming you have

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Instance methods and stopObserve

2011-10-06 Thread kstubs
T.J. Had to think outside the box on that one, I didn't know you could first: create the event listener event, then second: pass it in as the method argument for observe. That's a good one! Thanks for the help on this. Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[Proto-Scripty] BlindUp to a visible state

2011-10-06 Thread kstubs
I am using the BlindUp effect, but I don't want the element to disappear, but to BlindUp to a factor of X and then remain visible. Is this possible? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To view this discussion on the

Re: [Proto-Scripty] BlindUp to a visible state

2011-10-06 Thread Walter Lee Davis
Not directly with BlindUp, but you could probably do this very easily with Effect#morph. Walter On Oct 6, 2011, at 1:34 PM, kstubs wrote: I am using the BlindUp effect, but I don't want the element to disappear, but to BlindUp to a factor of X and then remain visible. Is this possible?