[Proto-Scripty] Re: High performance replacement of html elements

2009-06-03 Thread arianglan...@googlemail.com
Hi Walter and david, thanks for your input. @Walter: Maybe I gave a wrong impression. I am already doing it like you suggested. I go even further: the current status of the sorted list will only be saved when the user clicks a button "I am done sorting, save this". In my case it wouldn't be good

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Strange IE6 Bug in Sortable.create

2009-06-05 Thread arianglan...@googlemail.com
Hi David, thanks for the tests. What do you mean with expand? Specify a width for the select box? If you load the page -> change the window -> come back to the window with the list, it also works. But I can't tell this my users ;) On 4 Jun., 19:21, david wrote: > Hi Cyrus, > > I've made some t

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Strange IE6 Bug in Sortable.create

2009-06-05 Thread arianglan...@googlemail.com
I see now what you mean with expand. That cannot be a solution. There must be something else ;) On 4 Jun., 19:21, david wrote: > Hi Cyrus, > > I've made some test and can add some info. > The link CAN be clicked, you just need to expand the select option, > and it works now for all other links.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Strange IE6 Bug in Sortable.create

2009-06-08 Thread arianglan...@googlemail.com
othing seems to have good results, the bug is still > there. Nothng seems to change this IE6 behaviour ! > Isn't there another way you could do your sortable ?? > What would you try to do ?? > > -- > david > > On 5 juin, 10:00, "arianglan...@googlemail.com"

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Strange IE6 Bug in Sortable.create

2009-06-08 Thread arianglan...@googlemail.com
I could work arround this bug by using the delay option of Sortable.create. IE 6 now gets a delay of 100. It's not the best solution but it works. On 8 Jun., 13:38, "arianglan...@googlemail.com" wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking for a JS solution. I cannot really change