sert it, and then search for it.
>
> > On Dec 7, 5:10 pm, Rick.Wellman wrote:
> >> Is it just me,... I don't understand what you're even asking/trying
> >> to accomplish?
> >> What kind of "DOM" object are you hoping to create? Call it a
s terse but I truly do not understand your
question/goal.
-----Original Message-----
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com [mailto:prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Luke
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:59 AM
To: Prototype & script.aculo.us
Subject: [Proto-Sc
.
>
> Apologies if this seems terse but I truly do not understand your
> question/goal.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Luke
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010
terse but I truly do not understand your question/goal.
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Luke
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:59 AM
To: Prototype & script.aculo.us
Subject: [Proto-Scripty
On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Luke wrote:
Hm ok, hoped there would be a way I could generate a DOM object that
consists of just the HTML (without wrapper) and before I insert it.
There's no need for this, since inserting a string and inserting an
object have the same effect as long as you'r
Hm ok, hoped there would be a way I could generate a DOM object that
consists of just the HTML (without wrapper) and before I insert it.
On Dec 7, 4:52 pm, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> That's because I called innerHTML on it at the end, and that returns a
> string. If you then want to create a new
That's because I called innerHTML on it at the end, and that returns a
string. If you then want to create a new element out of that, you
could try inserting it into your page somewhere with
$('someElementOnYourPage').insert({after: foo});
Of you could just leave the innerHTML part off the en
Hmm, damn. the returned value is still a string :(
On Dec 7, 9:16 am, Luke wrote:
> Thanks Walter!
>
> On Dec 6, 6:28 pm, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>
> > > It's OT for this list, but have a look at Prototype.js. You can
> > > create
Thanks Walter!
On Dec 6, 6:28 pm, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>
> > It's OT for this list, but have a look at Prototype.js. You can
> > create a new DOM element in memory, and do all the things you want
> > to it without ever showing it to th
