Oh, by "sir" I mean T.J. Crowder (I hadn't yet seen the second
reply). I don't mean to crud up the list-serv, and thank you Matt
Foster, but I much prefer the first solution... just wanted to
clarify :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & s
Ahhh. Thank you so much, sir! This solution works perfectly for my
needs. And yes, it does make sense, I just didn't realize.
This is just so totally awesome... god this is the best day EVER!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.ac
I'd just put it in a variable.
parameters : '?method=saveData&data='+data.toJSON();
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Dec 17, 6:48 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ajax.Updater (and the rest) don't claim to post object graphs to the
> server, and in fact they don't. They only pass name-val
Hi,
Ajax.Updater (and the rest) don't claim to post object graphs to the
server, and in fact they don't. They only pass name-value pairs,
because they're doing normal HTTP GETs or POSTs, which are based on
name-value pairs. HTTP doesn't know anything about JSON.
If you want to pass an object grap
