Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Next dumb question

2011-02-18 Thread Bertilo Wennergren
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:16, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote: View source shows the original HTML used to create a document, subsequent changes to the document do not modify that. It's just how browsrs work, they could show an HTML representation of the current document (the innerHTML

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Next dumb question

2011-02-18 Thread Jon B.
In Firefox, if you select some text and then choose the View Selection Source option in the context menu, it *does* show you the current DOM and not the original HTML. ~Jon On Feb 18, 3:01 am, Bertilo Wennergren berti...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:16, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Next dumb question

2011-02-18 Thread Jeffrey Lee
As it turns out, if you have the firebug extension installed in Safari, you can view the current document in the web inspector. ___ Jeffrey Lee http://www.jeffreyalanlee.com jlee...@gmail.com On Feb 18, 2011, at 19:15 , Jon B. wrote: In Firefox, if you select some

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Next dumb question

2011-02-17 Thread RobG
On Feb 18, 10:28 am, Jeffrey Lee jlee...@gmail.com wrote: So why is it that when Javascript is updating the document, does the source not show the change?  Does show-source merely reflect that which was loaded, but not the actual current document?  Why is that? View source shows the