> > From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
> > [mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On
> > Behalf Of eulerss
> > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:22
> > To: Prototype & script.aculo.us
> > Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Question from an
#x27;s Place
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
> -Original Message-
> From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of eulerss
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:22
> To: Prototype & script.aculo.us
> Subject: [Pr
my problem was very similar, i only added the next line into my
script:
asynchronous: false,
and it works fine
eulerss
On 23 ene, 08:12, "david.0pl...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I get an hint that we are 'compaesani' :-P
>
> Anyhow.. thank you very much,I'm studying that link you gave me,
> meanwhil
I get an hint that we are 'compaesani' :-P
Anyhow.. thank you very much,I'm studying that link you gave me,
meanwhile, in my particular case setting to "syncronous" has indeed
resolved my issue.
Thank you very much for you toughtfull response
A presto
David(e)
On Jan 23, 2:08 pm, "T.J. Crowd
Ciao David,
By default, Ajax requests are asynchronous, and so they get *started*
when you do "new Ajax.Requst" but then they run for a while and
complete later; meanwhile, your code that started the request
continues. So what your anonymous function above returns will be
whatever value risultat
